BlockforcesandDeformationfromanOverhanging.docVIP

Forks and Pallets Hans Jostlein April 30, 2007 Summary We propose a new design approach to the block raiser forks and block support pallets. The new design reduces the longitudinal support deflection to 0.015 inches for the empty block while on the block raiser , reduces the unsupported lateral span to 17 inches, provides for fork droop correction, and allows the block to be set exactly vertical or with a slight bias toward the block raiser table for added stability during setting. When installed, the pallet supports 96% of the block area, is only 8 inches high, weighs 6500 # , and is easily assembled entirely from cut square tubing sections. This updated version differs by using an empty block weight of 313,000#, and a maximum usable stress of 10,000psi in the forks. We have increased the tubing and fork dimensions to meet those specifications, with a negligible change in cost. Introduction It is assumed that each block (of 30 or 32 planes) will sit on a pallet for two reasons: To provide clearance for the forks that the block raiser uses to hold the blocks; To provide a witness space for monitoring any oil spills. This note addresses requirements and offers a solution for the design of the pallets and the forks. Requirements For lift-truck type forks, Ang Lee has shown that the droop at the tip must not exceed ? inch in order to keep stresses in the PVC at acceptable levels. Similarly, he has shown that the lateral sag between support forks must not exceed 0.080 inches. There is an additional requirement for safe block handling while on the forks. The block should not develop a gap between its top and the block raiser table. Such a gap will leave the block controlled only by the relatively compliant forks. It is desirable to be able to snug up the block to the table, or even ad a small bias force at its top toward the table. Design Concepts So far, two design concepts have been proposed: Support the block on a pallet that sits on forks. The pallet d