Putnamsostensivedefinitionofsemanticsfornaturalkind.docVIP

Putnamsostensivedefinitionofsemanticsfornaturalkind.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Putnamsostensivedefinitionofsemanticsfornaturalkind.doc

WATER IS WHATEVER THERE IS TO WATER Yuncheng Zhou What does “water” mean in the statement, “this is water”, when uttered by someone who points to the liquid in the glass? Meaning of “water” might be given as follows: water is whatever there is to water. This is the answer that could be learned from the first reading of Hilary Putnam’s landmark paper, “Meaning of ‘Meaning’”. In fact, it is a good epitome of what Putnam says about meaning of “water” in the paper. What Putnam does in the paper is to propose a semantic theory for natural kind terms like “water”. However, presentation of this theory in the paper seems to me more rhetorical than logical. What is needed is to present a formalized version of this theory so as to highlight some of the problems that are vital in philosophy of language and philosophy of mind. Hence comes this paper. First, a primary formal characterization of semantic theory for natural kind terms is given in accordance with Putnam’s presentation of ostensive definition for a natural kind term like “water”; then, the formal characterization is to be interpreted together with construal of the twin earth thought experiment; what follows is the major part of this paper: my argumentation for epistemological and metaphysical understanding of meaning of natural kind terms; last but not least, indexicality, rigidity and necessary truth are to be discussed within the theoretic framework that is defended in this paper. It is noted that the formal characterization is to get more and more perfected with development of semantic theory for natural kind terms in this paper. However, a main task though it is in the paper, the formal characterization is but an ancillary apparatus employed to illustrate the semantic theory. Another point worthy of notice is that my argumentation for the semantic theory is much indebted to Kripke’s clarification of necessity in epistemological and metaphysical senses. Primary Formal Characterization of Putnam’s Seman

文档评论(0)

***** + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:8010045112000002

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档