- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
IsKannadaEndangered-SchoolofArtsamp;Sciences.doc
Is Kannada “Endangered”?
H. Schiffman
South Asia Studies
University of Pennsylvania
Recently in press reports from Karnataka, claims have been made that Kannada is an endangered language, and needs to have some protection in order to help preserve it. Calls have also been made by some to award ‘classical’ language status to Kannada, following the awarding of this status to Tamil, which had been seeking it since at least 1937. This paper tries to address the question of whether Kannada is actually in danger of extinction, or being replaced by some other language, examining this claim in light of what we know about ‘endangered’ status for other languages, what it is necessary to do to ‘save’ a language from extinction, and other factors that may be involved in this issue. I conclude that Kannada is not in fact endangered in any sense of the word, but that there are grievances in the Kannadiga community about the dominance of other languages in Karnataka, especially in Bangalore.
Review of Literature. The issue of language endangerment in South Asia, especially for small languages spoken only by a few thousand speakers, is a real and present one, and there is some literature on the subject (Turin 2005). For a language like Kannada, with millions of mother tongue speakers, the issue has been dealt with mostly in the press, rather than in scholarly journals. An early study on this, Banakar 1982, demonstrated the ‘grievance’ aspect of this issue, in showing how Karnataka, with its large percentage of linguistic minorities compared to other states in India, was ‘showing the way’ and providing education and other services for its linguistic minorities, while other neighboring states were not. Schiffman 1996 also showed that while the establishment of linguistic states in the 1950’s did much to protect large linguistic groups, the guarantees for smaller groups within those states lacked teeth, and that small groups were largely powerless if their rights were tramp
您可能关注的文档
- httpPPTSWorld.blogspot.comDIRECTCURRENT.doc
- HuckleberryFinn.doc
- HudsonRiverValleyEnvironmentalProblems-The.ppt
- Human-EnvironmentRelations-TheUniversityofTexasat.ppt
- HumanRemains-AlvinISD.ppt
- HumphreyTonkin-UNotes-UniversityofHartford.doc
- HunterShockMaintenanceRebuildGuide-huntershocks.com.doc
- hw6_loopsHailstone.doc-Umbc.doc
- Hydrogen-enhanceddislocationactivityandvacancy.PDF
- HydrogenFuelCellTechnologyanditsEnvironmental.doc
文档评论(0)