数据驱动媒体架构.pptVIP

Data-driven Overlay Network 目录 Application layer multicast Data driven Design Peer-to-peer Receiver-driven Overlays Comparison 一些想法 Application Level Multicast  Application Level Multicast VS. IP Multicast 效率：IP组播比应用层组播效率高， 部署：应用层组播比IP组播容易部署。 IP组播需要改变路由器和end-system的上的IP层协议。－－－部署困难 应用层组播只需要对end-system添加应用层的软件就可以实现。－－－部署容易 由于应用层组播只是在end-system添加应用层的软件，所以应用层组播又叫end-system multicast 应用层组播的研究现状 应用层的研究由两部分构成： Overlay construct Data delivery 今天讲的是Overlay construct Approaches Mesh-first approach 首先构建mesh结构，在mesh基础上构建最佳树 Tree-first approach 直接构建tree Other approaches Eg: 混合模型, NICE; CAN, Scribe Data driven Design（ Receiver-driven） Availability of data guides the flow directions, not a specific overlay structure Suitable for overlay with high dynamic nodes: multiple parents Examples: Coolstreaming, PRO, PALS Peer-to-peer Receiver-driven Overlays The main design philosophy Independently and selfishly choose the best way to connect to the Overlay Two key Components peer discover (PD) peer selection (PS) Peer Discover Initial parents selection new peer connect to the original server Target selection determine a target peer for gossip Content selection select sgm records that are most useful for target peer. ( Bidirectional gossip) Image maintenance integrate new records and discard excess records Interactions between PD and PS  Peer-to-peer Receiver-driven Overlays Ps mechanism is essentially a progressive search within the local image for a subset of parent peers When should a new parent be select initial phase replacing a poorly-performing peer Improvement in performance Conservative approach a demand-driven fashion !  Comparison of ALM and Data-driven Fairness (Defined by bandwidth ratio) Data-driven approach is better!! Reliance to failures Data-driven approach is better!! Locality Data-driven approach can not concern locality!! 一些想法 PRO中许多参数如根据带宽和延时对节点进行排序，每个节点拥有的父节点数等，都没有明确，需要进一步的细化工作。 Cross-ISP的