论冒名处分行为的法律效力.pdf

万方数据 万方数据 摘要 论冒名处分行为的法律效力 摘 要 冒名处分他人之物的行为近年来多有发生，标的物包括动产、不 动产、债权等。此类问题在法律上缺乏明确的规范，学者们的研究进 路也多集中于类推适用代理制度或适用善意取得制度这两个方面。笔 者认为，对于冒名处分行为不应做笼统的处理，根据标的物性质的不 同而分别对待似乎更为合理。当标的物为动产时，冒名处分行为与无 权处分行为并无本质差异，因此可适用善意取得制度。当标的物为不 动产时，冒名处分行为则因不存在登记错误而不同于不动产的无权处 分，因而不存在适用善意取得制度的前提。此时使原权利人享有无偿 追回权才是于法理于价值衡量都更合理的选择。当标的物为债权时， 冒名处分行为的构成则与债权的准占有无异，因此应借用债权的准占 有制度，使债务人向冒名人的清偿行为在满足相关条件的情形下产生 效力。 关键词：冒名处分,无权处分,代理,善意取得,债权准占有 III 万方数据 Abstract ON THE LEGAL EFFECT OF IMPERSONATED DISPOSITION ABSTRACT Impersonated disposition of others’ objects such as movables, immovables and claim appears frequently in recent years. There are no legal norms about this kind of problems. The scholars’ researches on this problem are most focused on whether the bona fide acquisition system or the unauthorized agency theory can be applied. However, using the same way to deal with all impersonated disposition is not that reasonable. Treat them differently according to subject matter seems more logical. When the subject matter is movable, the bona fide acquisition can be applied. When the subject matter is immovable, the rights of gratuitous recovery should be given to the proprietor. When the subject matter is claim, the quasi-position theory should be applied. KEY WORDS: impersonated disposition, unauthorized disposition, agency, bona fide acquisition, quasi-posi