hover widgets using the tracking state to extend the.ppt

Hover Widgets: Using the Tracking State to Extend the Capabilities of Pen-Operated Devices Tovi Grossman Ken Hinckley Patrick Baudisch Maneesh Agrawala Ravin Balakrishnan Pen-Based Interfaces Great for notes, sketches Lack of shortcuts problematic Pen-Based Interfaces Great for notes, sketches Lack of shortcuts problematic Round trip problem Localized User Interfaces Gesture Interaction Tivoli (Moran, Chiu, Melle. UIST ’97) SKETCH (Zeleznik, Herndon Hughes. SIGGRAPH ’96) DENIM (Newman, Lin, Hong Landay. HCI ’03) Menu Interaction Marking Menu (Kurtenbach Buxton. CHI ’93) Flow Menu (Guimbretière Winograd. UIST ’03) Scroll ring (Smith schraefel. Moscovich Hughes. UIST ’04) Hybrid Scriboli (Hinckley, Baudisch, Ramos, Guimbretière. CHI ’05) Localized User Interfaces Gesture Interaction Ink confused with gesture Explicitly switch with button Menu Interaction Activated with button Localized User Interfaces Localized User Interfaces Localized User Interfaces Design Challenge Localized user interface Clearly distinct from ink input No button required Tracking menus Hover Widgets Gesture in tracking state Widget fades in Click on widget Hover Widgets Design Considerations Shape Design Considerations Shape Recognition Design Considerations Shape Recognition Visualization DEMO Experiment Independent Variables Results Results Summary Future Work Future Work Acknowledgements Questions? Using the Tracking State Tool tips Using the Tracking State Tool tips Input panel gesture Pilot Study False Activations Visualization Learning Adaptive Systems and Interaction Research Group Microsoft Research Dynamic Graphics Project Dept of Computer Science University of Toronto Fitzmaurice G., Khan A., Pieke R., Buxton B., Kurtenbach G. UIST 2003 Technique (Hover Widget, Icon) GridN (4, 8, 12) Distance (300, 600, 900, 1200) Reduced Movement Time Reduced Movement Time Increased Accuracy New distinct command layer Button free Loc