- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
cooperative learning methods a meta-analysis - wikispaces
Cooperative Learning Methods: A Meta-Analysis
David W. Johnson, Roger T. Johnson, and Mary Beth Stanne
University of Minnesota
60 Peik Hall
159 Pillsbury Drive, S.E.
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
May, 2000
Running Head: Cooperative Learning Methods
Abstract
Cooperative learning is one of the most widespread and fruitful areas of theory, research, and practice in education. Reviews of the research, however, have focused either on the entire literature which includes research conducted in noneducational settings or have included only a partial set of studies that may or may not validly represent the whole literature. There has never been a comprehensive review of the research on the effectiveness in increasing achievement of the methods of cooperative learning used in schools. An extensive search found 164 studies investigating eight cooperative learning methods. The studies yielded 194 independent effect sizes representing academic achievement. All eight cooperative learning methods had a significant positive impact on student achievement. When the impact of cooperative learning was compared with competitive learning, Learning Together (LT) promoted the greatest effect, followed by Academic Controversy (AC), Student-Team-Achievement-Divisions (STAD), Teams-Games-Tournaments (TGT), Group Investigation (GI), Jigsaw, Teams-Assisted-Individualization (TAI), and finally Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC). When the impact of cooperative lessons was compared with individualistic learning, LT promotes the greatest effect, followed by AC, GI, TGT, TAI, STAD, Jigsaw, and CIRC. The consistency of the results and the diversity of the cooperative learning methods provide strong validation for its effectiveness.
?
?
Cooperative Learning Methods: A Meta-Analysis
Cooperative learning is one of the most remarkable and fertile areas of theory, research, and practice in education. Cooperative learning exists when students work together to accomplis
您可能关注的文档
- a parser project in a programming languages course.doc
- a preliminary strongstudystrong on the philippine organic rice subsector.doc
- a raisin in the sun - ladue school district.doc
- a research-based justification for debate across the.doc
- a retrospective and prospective survey of time-use research.doc
- a randomized controlled trial of - berkeley-haas.doc
- a risk-based design methodology for pollution prevention and.doc
- a separate peace chapter 1 reading and strongstudystrong guide.doc
- a sample article title - oxford journals.doc
- a streetcar named desire strongstudystrong guide.doc
- cost-effectiveness of intensified versus conventional.doc
- corporate social responsibility – the corporate world’s.doc
- coordination failure in market statistic games.doc
- could the rwandan genocide have been prevented - genocide.doc
- correlation of proband and sibling stroke latency the swiss.doc
- counterfeit goods and the public's health and safety.doc
- course comparative economic systems.doc
- course hazardous materials chemistry i.doc
- critical issues children face in the 2000’s.doc
- crossing cultural boundaries latino parents’ involvement in.doc
文档评论(0)