- 1、本文档共17页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
knowledge management and strongenterprisestrong risk management
Knowledge Management and Enterprise Risk Management Implementation in Financial
Services
Eduardo Rodriguez PhD Candidate Aston Business School,
Export Development Canada EDC Ottawa Canada
Principal IQAnalytics Canada eduardo.rodriguez@
John S. Edwards Professor of O.R. and Systems, Operations Information Management
Group, Aston Business School Aston University Birmingham, U.K.
j.s.edwards@aston.ac.uk
Abstract
This paper starts from the viewpoint that enterprise risk management is a specific application of knowledge in order to control
deviations from strategic objectives, shareholders’ values and stakeholders’ relationships. This study is looking for insights into
how the application of knowledge management processes can improve the implementation of enterprise risk management. This
article presents the preliminary results of a survey on this topic carried out in the financial services sector, extending a previous
pilot study that was in retail banking only.
Five hypotheses about the relationship of knowledge management variables to the perceived value of ERM implementation
were considered. The survey results show that the two people-related variables, perceived quality of communication among
groups and perceived quality of knowledge sharing were positively associated with the perceived value of ERM implementation.
However, the results did not support a positive association for the three variables more related to technology, namely network
capacity for connecting people (which was marginally significant), risk management information system functionality and
perceived integration of the information systems. Perceived quality of communication among groups appeared to be clearly the
most significant of these five factors in affecting the perceived value of ERM implementation.
Key words: Knowledge Management, Enterprise
您可能关注的文档
- income inequality and current strongaccountstrong imbalances - imf.org.pdf
- income distribution, aggregate demand and current strongaccountstrong a.pdf
- incentives for subjects in internet experiments.pdf
- incorporating estimation errors into portfolio selection.pdf
- incomplete integration and contagion of debt distress in.pdf
- increased potassium intake from fruit and vegetables or.pdf
- increase of ‘health and human rights’ research strongarticlesstrong in.pdf
- incremental strongmodelstrong synchronization for efficient run-time.pdf
- indicator-based policy compliance of business strongprocessesstrong.pdf
- indirect incentives of hedge strongfundstrong managers - american.edu.pdf
- 2025年江西省时事政治考试试卷带解析必背(有一套).docx
- 2025年河南省公务员考试时事政治考试试卷带解析附完整答案【全优】.docx
- 2025年河南省公务员考试时事政治考试试卷带解析及完整答案【各地真题】.docx
- 2025年辽宁省公务员考试时事政治考试试卷带解析附完整答案【夺冠】.docx
- 2025年河南省时事政治考试试卷带解析含答案【预热题】.docx
- 江西昌河航空工业有限公司校园招聘模拟试题附带答案详解及参考答案1套.docx
- 2025年江西省时事政治考试试卷带解析必背(综合题).docx
- 2024年案件风险防控学习心得体会范例(4篇) .pdf
- 2025年江西省时事政治考试试卷带解析(全国通用).docx
- 2024年竣工验收管理制度(三篇) .pdf
文档评论(0)