- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Privacy and Employment Torts.ppt
EMPLOYMENT LAW PROFESSOR BARBARA LEE Employee PrivacyandWorkplace Torts What is Privacy? The right to be left alone The right to control who has access to information about you The right to withhold personal information Where do people have a greater expectation of privacy? A limited expectation of privacy? No expectation of privacy? Legal Claims Regarding Privacy Common law invasion of privacy (tort claim) Fourth Amendment (applicable only to government intrusions on privacy) Police Public sector employers Fourth Amendment The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Search Of the person Of property Seizure Of the person Of property In order to have a claim of privacy, there must be a legitimate expectation of privacy Employer practice Employer words (in handbook, etc.) Common law expectations (zones of privacy—in one’s body, in a building, in a car) Invasion of Privacy Tort claim (common law) Types of invasion of privacy claim Intrusion upon seclusion Placing the person before the public in a false light Appropriation of person’s name or image (photo) Publicizing private facts Privacy claims at work Locker, desk, handbag searches Searches of email Searches of voicemail Searches of hard copy documents that are personal to the employee Searches of employee’s body Off-Work Privacy Hobbies Friendships Romantic relationships Social network postings Political activity Smoking and moderate alcohol consumption Drug use Drug Testing Private sector: virtually no regulation Testing of applicants found lawful For-cause testing of employees found lawful Random testing in certain occupations is lawful (see Hennessey case) Public sector: 4th Amendment applies Random testing unlawful in m
文档评论(0)