02-第5章-SA设计与评估-评估要点.pptVIP

1.2 变化性场景的例子 * * ? Use case scenarios (用例场景) ? Growth scenarios (变化性场景) ? Add a new message type to the system’s repertoire in less that a person-week of work. (使用少于1人周的工作量即可在系统中加入一 种新的消息类型) ? Migrate to a new operating system, or a new release of the existing operating system in less than a person-year of work. (使用少于1人 周的工作量即可将系统迁移到其他OS) ? Double the size of existing database tables while maintaining 1 second average retrieval time. (可以将数据表的尺寸增加一倍，但 其平均存取时间却仍然维持1秒) ? Exploratory scenarios (探测性场景) 1.3 探测性场景的例子 * * ? Use case scenarios (用例场景) ? Growth scenarios (变化性场景) ? Exploratory scenarios (探测性场景) ? Half of the servers go down during normal operation without affecting overall system availability. (即使50%的服务器停止工作也 不会影响整个系统的可用性) ? Improve the system’s availability from 98% to 99.999%. (将系统的 可用性从98%提高到99.999%) ? Tenfold increase in the number of bids processed hourly while keeping worst-case response time below 10 seconds. (每小时交易 数据成10倍量的增加，但保持最差的响应时间在10秒之内) 输入2：对质量属性的提问 * * ? Quality attribute questions probe styles to elicit architectural decisions which bear on quality attribute requirements. (质询 体系结构在特定的质量需求上如何作为) ? Performance (性能) ? How are priorities assigned to processes? (怎样决定进程的优先 级？) ? What are the message arrival rates? (消息到来的频率是多少？) ? Modifiability (可修改性) ? Are there any places where layers/facades are circumvented? (是 否按层封装功能？) ? What components rely on detailed knowledge of message formats? (哪些构件依赖消息格式的细节？) 通过“头脑风暴”，尽可能汇总与质量属性相关的各类问题 中间结果：Utility Tree (效用树) * * ? Utility trees provide a top-down mechanism for directly and efficiently translating the business drivers of a system into concrete quality attribute scenarios. (效用树：提供了一种自顶向下的机制来将系统的业务 驱动要素翻译为具体的质量属性及其场景) ? Purpose: provides a prioritized list of scenarios (目 的：对场景的优先级进行排序) ? 可使用各种各样的排序方法，例如：投票 * * 输出1：风险和非风险(Risk and Non-risk) * * ? Risks are potentially