BrinkmanReportSettingPrioritiesforLargeFacilityProjects-NSF.ppt

BrinkmanReportSettingPrioritiesforLargeFacilityProjects-NSF.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共5页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
BrinkmanReportSettingPrioritiesforLargeFacilityProjects-NSF.ppt

Brinkman Report: Setting Priorities for Large Facility Projects Sponsored by the NSF Key Issues Raised in Report Transparency of process (next slide) Involvement of community (next slide) Roadmap (spurred by Orbach’s 20-year plan) NSF is not DOE (integration of RE, community-driven, university-based, transformational, riskier, cuts across more communities) Need to maintain flexibility and responsiveness to community Role of Deputy Director of BFA for Large Facilities “oversight of process” Oversight Direct oversight within Directorates/Divisions (full time program officer) Role of NSB Validation of process, input on process Design development funds (~10% of construction) Responsibility of Divisions/Directorates Department of Energy Office of Science (OS) provides 60% of the support for basic research in the Physical Sciences (3.4B$) 10 National Laboratories + support for university groups Facilities Plan 53 considered, 23 in list Developed with help of OS’s 6 Assoc Directors and 6 Advisory Cmtes Final priorities determined by OS Director Orbach The MREFC Approval Process Divisonal/Directorate Review Review by NSF MREFC Committee Review by Director’s Review Board Approved by Director for consideration by the NSB Approved by the NSB for inclusion in “the queue” Approved by Director and NSB for inclusion in NSF’s budget request to the President Approved for inclusion in the President’s budget request (currently working on FY06) Congress appropriates Funds NSF (Director and NSB) approves award when appropriated funds are available Did not address: lifecycle costs Operations maintenance (~10% / yr) Major upgrades (~50%??) eg, AdvLIGO Research (+5% / yr) Over the lifetime these amount to several times the construction costs and currently must come from Division/Directorates NSF Response Current process largely addresses points raised, two main items need attention Transparency (need to articulate process) Roadmap (need something that works for NSF) Congres

文档评论(0)

ailuojue + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档