不动产查封实务研究.pdfVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
摘 要 产保全制度;重大案件执行的听证前置制度;对强制管理措施制度的完善,提出不仅要 注意查封的方法、也要注重保护当事各方的合法利益;完善查封登记制度,形成查封后 及时登记的工作模式;呼吁建立有人民法院、房地产管理部门和国土资源部门共享的不 动产信息管理抑或监控的平台,以便实现对不动产查封的动态管理,保障交易的安全性 和效率性;仿效法国的保全性裁判抵押权制度,结合我国的具体国情将该制度加以具体 改造并运用,建立具有中国特色的保全性裁判抵押权制度。以期实现司法的公正、维护 当事人的合法权益、保证交易秩序的安全、稳定。 关键词 不动产 查封 强制管理 登记 公示 实务 II Abstract Abstract This subject for study is the real estate seizure。The immovable property in the seizure is made of analysis and discussion over the instructions, including the text and conclusion, the references and thank you for a total of five chapter seven parts. the total word number is more 22000. From the court practice during the process encountered a real estate cases of seizure. In real life of the immovable property during the seizure of sealing up when the seller of choice question, Pointed out the real estate in the seizure the significance of the seizure and immovable property in the immediate interests of major impact. The first chapter is an overview of the seizure. In this part, we firstly introduced the concept of real estate and seizure of the seizure, principles and methods. Particularly focuses on real estate the concept of the seizure, the principles and features and conditions and the continental legal system countries in the seizure of the question of legislation within the different pattern. The second chapter is the analysis of the practice problems. The beginning of this chapter is to review the current seizure of property, as legal and relevant judicial interpretations of the provisions of principle. Especially some provisions of the judicial abstractness that the activities of sealing up ,freezing and other measures are implemented at a wide degree of anomie and arbitrariness. This is not only affect part of the implementation of the case, to some extent, resulted in cases of the situation

文档评论(0)

gubeiren_001 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档