罗益家-制冷专业英语.pptVIP

Theoretical comparison of low GWP alternatives for different refrigeration configurations taking R404A as baseline 罗益家 卓热1201  * * content 1：Introduction 2：Working fluids 3：Configurations selected 4：Simulation conditions and equations applied 5：Results and discussion 6: Conclusions * 1：Introduction the aim of this work is to compare theoretically the energy performance of four vapour compression refrigeration configurations using R404A and low GWP refrigerants R407A, R407F, L40, DR-7, N40 and DR-33 as alternative fluids. This paper is organised as follows: In Section 2, the main properties of the chosenworking fluids are exposed. In Section 3, the proposed configurations are presented. In Section 4, the equations used to obtain the expected performance are introduced. In Section 5, the results are shown and discussed. Finally, Section 6 summarizes themain conclusions of the work. * Six refrigerants Six refrigerants are evaluated as low GWP replacements for R404A using different configurations, including two-stage system architectures. These refrigerants are selected according,to similar characteristics to R404A, and they are the mid-term alternatives R407A and R407F, and the long-term alternatives: L40 and DR-7 (with very low GWP and low flammability), N40 and DR-33 (with low GWP and no flammability). In order to have a complete comparison range, various operating conditions are considered, covering low and medium evaporator temperatures and two levels of condensation temperatures. Configurations selected are presented and the equations used to simulate the expected performance are shown. From a given cooling capacity, volumetric flow rate and COP are compared, taking R404A as baseline. The most efficient alternatives are the low-flammable refrigerants, L40 and DR-7, and when no flammability is acceptable, N40 and DR-33 are also