科学革命的结构 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.doc

科学革命的结构 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
科学革命的结构 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Second Edition, Enlarged Thomas S. Kuhn VOLUMES I AND II ? FOUNDATIONS Of THE UNITY OF SCIENCE VOLUME II ? NUMBER 2 Contents Preface i I. Introduction: A Role for History 1 II. The Route to Normal Science 7 III. The Nature of Normal Science 14 IV. Normal Science as Puzzle-solving 21 V. The Priority of Paradigms 26 VI. Anomaly and the Emergence of Scientific Discoveries 31 VII. Crisis and the Emergence of Scientific Theories 39 VIII. The Response to Crisis 46 IX. The Nature and Necessity of Scientific Revolutions 55 X. Revolutions as Changes of World View 67 XI. The Invisibility of Revolutions 82 XII. The Resolution of Revolutions 87 XIII. Progress through Revolutions 97 Preface The essay that follows is the first full published report on a project originally conceived almost fifteen years ago. At that time I was a graduate student in theoretical physics already with sight of the end of my dissertation. A fortunate involve-men with an experimental college course treating physical science for the non-scientist provided my first exposure to the history of science. To my complete surprise, that exposure to out-of-date scientific theory and practice radically undermined some of my basic conceptions about the nature of science and the reasons for its special success. Those conceptions were ones I had previously drawn partly from scientific training itself and partly from a long-standing avocational interest in the philosophy of science. Somehow, whatever their pedagogic utility and their abstract plausibility, those notions did not at all fit the enterprise that historical study displayed. Yet they were and are fundamental to many discussions of science, and their failures of verisimilitude therefore seemed thoroughly worth pursuing. The result was a drastic shift in my career plans, a shift from physics to history of science and then, gradually, from relatively straightforward historical problems back to the more

文档评论(0)

yaobanwd + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档