For yield under a single.docVIP

For yield under a single, uniaxial state of stress,the stress would be equated to Sy. 对于下单，单轴应力状态屈服，应力将等同于Thus for yield, a single, uniaxial state of stress equivalent to the general state of stress is equated to the left-hand side of Eq 因此，对于产量，单一，压力相当于一般国家的单轴应力状态是等同的方程左边 这相当于强调的是调用冯米塞斯应力，并给出 Thus, based on the von Mises theory, the condition for yielding is when the equivalent von Mises stress equals the yield strength of the material. That is 因此，在冯米塞斯理论为基础，对高产的条件是，当等效von Mises应力等于材料的屈服强度。这是 Example 7.3-2 Estimate the torque on a 10-mm-dianeter steel shaft when yielding beings using a the Tresca and b the von Mises theory. The yield strength of the steel is 140 MPa 估计在10毫米直径的钢轴扭矩时产生众生使用（一）Tresca和（二）冯米塞斯的理论。该钢的屈服强度为140兆帕 S剪切屈服强度的一半的拉伸屈服强度。扭转中的最大剪应力因此等同于剪切屈服强度，造成 Solving for the torque yields 解决的扭矩产量 一个元素与一剪应力集主要讲，说被发现使用式（7.3-3）来 Substituting this into Eq. 7.3-11 yields Or Substituting and solving for the torque results in 代和的扭矩结果Thus, it can be seen that for yielding in pure torsion, the von Mises theory predicts a torque which is 15 percent greater than the prediction of the Tresca theory. Tests on ductile materials have shown that the von Mises theory is much more accurate for predicting yield, but in design work the more conservative answer predicted by the Tresca theory is commonly used. 因此，可以看出，在纯扭转屈服，冯米塞斯理论预测扭矩的15％以上的Tresca理论预测更大。在韧性材料的测试表明，冯米塞斯理论更为准确的预测产量，但在设计工作中比较保守的回答由Tresca理论预测是常用的。 TRESCA理论和冯米塞斯理论之间的比较（平面应力）For plane stress, let . Thus one of the principal stresses is zero and is in the Z direction. The other two principal stresses and are determined from Eq. 7.3-3 .to understand the difference between the Tresca and von Mises theories, a graph of versus （）is drawn. First, the Tresca theory will be developed for various cases. The first three cases are for and are 对于平面应力，让。因此，主要讲的一个是零，在Z方向。另外两个主应力（）和（）确定由式（7.3-3）之间的了解和冯米塞斯Tresca理论的区别，一个图（）与（）绘制。首先，Tresca理论将发展各种。前三种情况是（） （），并There are three other cases similar to these, corresponding to