- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
开放骨折 值得看
Infections in Orthopaedic TraumaMinimizing Infections After OpenFractures Barnaby Dedmond, MD GUSTILO ANDERSON 19761 Types 1, 2, 3 Updated 19842 Types 3A, 3B, 3C Classification—Why do we care? Classification correlates with prognosis Antibiotics in Open Fractures The use of antibiotics in open fractures has a protective effect against early infection compared with no antibiotics or placebo (Relative risk 0.41) Choice of Antibiotics in Open Fractures No difference in infection rates between clindamycin and cefazolin (anything vs S. aureus will work) Choice of Antibiotics in Open Fractures Due to gram negative contamination, add aminoglycoside for Grade 3 Farm injuries and Vascular injuries, give ampicillin or penicillin Don’t forget tetanus Duration ofAntibiotics in Open Fractures In a double blind, prospective trial, no difference in infection rates between 1 and 5 days of post operative antibiotics in open fractures Initial ID Timing Classic: within 6 hours Recently being challenged No infections in 91 isolated open Type 1 fractures treated without ID (except at time of fixation on avg 5 days after injury)1 No difference in infection rate in children will all types of open fractures treated 0-6 hours and 7-24 hours from time of injury2 I still consider all open fractures emergencies The Irrigation Amount No good data Animal studies show improved removal of particulate matter and bacteria but effect plateaus at a level dependent on the system Anglen recommends 3L for Gr 1, 6L for Gr 2, 9L for Gr 3 The Irrigation The Delivery Method Bulb Syringe vs. Pulsatile Lavage Animal study shows pulsatile lavage has a detrimental effect on early bone healing, but this effect is no longer present at 2 weeks1 Animal study shows more soft tissue destruction with pulsatile lavage2 Animal study shows pulsatile lavage to be more effective in removing particulate matter and bacteria3 Low pressure pulsatile lavage may result in fewer infections (ongoing study)
文档评论(0)