我在看晶体塑性理论的时候，遇到一个公式推导，作者在-imechanica.docVIP

When I was reading a book about crystal plasticity theory, I encountered a derivation of formula. In the Author’s derivation , he used such a tensor equation as: Note: 1 : All the tensor are second-order tensor 2 : dot product must come first, double dot product come second. I try to prove the correctness of the formula, in fact it’s easy to prove it using the component expression of the tensor. Throught the component expression, I found that such formula should have a more universal form, we can derivate more and more tensor equations in the same fashion. We can find that: ，，, Both of them have a index of the same. So, both of them can make a dot product. Then make a double product with the residual tensor. The possible dot product between two tensors, such as: Dot product Between and have ， two form Dot product Between and have ， two form Dot product Between and have ， two form Next step is double dot product: We take as a example, the tensor should double dot product to is . In order to establish a equation as : We let , As we know So we set Then : As we know dot product between two second-order tensor can be exchanged. Such sa: , The component expression is: So： In the same theory, we can derivate all the equations, There are total of tewlve formulation: All the component expression list below: