AnimalResearchEthics-RadfordUniversity.pptVIP

  1. 1、本文档共20页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
AnimalResearchEthics-RadfordUniversity.ppt

Experimental Design Experiment: A type of research study that tests the idea that one variable causes an effect on another variable. Anatomy of an Experiment Example Memory Cues No Memory Cues N1 10 N2 10 M1 16.2 M2 9.9 S1 2.49 S2 2.33 Independent variable Memory Training Group Dependent variable Memory for personal history Anatomy of an Experiment Example Experimental Control Group Group Memory Cues No Memory Cues N1 10 N2 10 M1 16.2 M2 9.9 S1 2.49 S2 2.33 The study allows the researcher to determine that on variable causes an effect on another variable. Internal Validity Conditions to establish internal validity Time-Order relationship Cause ? Effect I.V. ? D.V. Conditions to establish internal validity No alternative explanations The difference between the means is due only to the independent variable. Anything else represents a threat to the internal validity of the study Threats to internal validity Non-equivalent control group Confound: A way in which the groups differ from each other, other than the independent variable. Controlling for confounds 1. Random assignment to groups 2. Matching Threats to internal validity Floor or Ceiling effects The independent variable has made the groups different from each other, but the dependent variable is unable to detect it. Floor effect: The test is so difficult that everyone gets a very low score. Ceiling effect: The test is so easy that everyone gets a high score. They make the means closer together than they should be. Threats to internal validity Experimenter effect The experimenter gives an indication of what they want or expect the subject to do in a particular condition. Participant effect The participant changes their behavior to fit what they think the researcher is studying. Ways to address experimenter and participant effects Single-blind study: The participant doesn’t know which condition they’re in. Example: a placebo-controlled condition. Double-blind design:

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

ailuojue3 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档