HEADFI上560的一些讨论.docVIP

#+译#head-fi上一些HE-560讨论(第248-256页)（更新head-fi版主jude评价） 第248---256页 ? Previous 1…245246247 248 249250251252253…266 Next ? Start a New Thread post #3706 of 3976 6/23/14 at 7:12am ThePianoMan offline 208 Posts. Joined 3/2014 I couldnt say for sure - Like I said thepre-production had more perceived bass, but it sounded like it wasjust a tad warmer than the revised model. So perhaps theyre the same or eventhe new one has more. The pre-production felt just a little fatter in the bass,perhaps? and the new one maybe with just a little more perceived clarity. Itwasnt a huge change, but the revised one sounded ever so slightly clearer tomy ears (and I tried both the new ones HiFiMan had there) Like I said, the differences were not night-and-day,but I imagine anyone chasing that thicker signature would be happier with the400i anyways. YMMV. 我不能非常肯定的说预售版的低频更容易让人感知，但是它确实比修订版的听起来声音稍微更温暖一点。所以也许它们是一样的，或者新版的HE-560低频更丰富。而预售版也许只是低频更加快一点。而且新版的耳机也许声音的解析度更高。这不是一个很大的改变，但是修订版560是我所听过的最清晰的一个。（我还听过海菲曼最新的400i）。就想我说过的两个版本的区别不是很大,但是对那些追求更厚重的音效分朋友来说，400i可能是一个更好的选择。 post #3733 of 3976 6/23/14 at 10:50am cute offline 1,645 Posts. Joined 3/2010 Location: Rochester, Minnesota Area Quote: Originally Posted by TMRaven Im not a believer in burn-in. If the mids are less warm on day 1 theyllmost likely be less warm on day 7. 我并不相信煲机什么的。如果它的中频在最开始的时候就缺乏温暖那么它极有可能在以后也是这样。 Ill only be listening to these for today and thenIll ship them off to Purrin for measurements. Hell probably have a few words on how they sound and compare too. 我只有今天一天有时间听560，然后我会把它寄给Purrin去做一些测试。他可能会对560的声音做一些评价然后再与别的耳机做一些对比。 I think the bass, about the same, the mids, less warmbut more clarity, the treble definitely more sparke/clarity. I dont know what it is called,woodblock/cowbell?...but my first test track is from Mark Knopfler, On EveryStreet Album, track You and Youre Friend....the drummer taps thisto make a ticking sound (Im not a musician, can someone help me with theterminology). This is very distinct