可靠性体系差距评估-（双语）final.docVIP

FREP可靠性体系差距评估Difference Assessment on FREPs Reliability System 评估人：Assessed by: 要素Element 设备策略Equipment strategies 业主：刘彦昌Owner: Liu Yanchang 管理者：刘翔Administrator: Liu Xiang 6C 要求Requirement 现行作法Current practice 差距Difference 备注Remarks 6C.1 1 所有的设备均应有与其重要性相一致的设备策略(例如特定的、一般的或未确定的任务)，并根据其设备策略进行维护。 All equipment shall have equipment strateg (such as tasks that are specific, common, or not identified) that is consistent with its significance. The equipment shall be maintained in accordance with its equipment strategies. 设备重要性分级；Significance classification equipment; 编制设备策略5年计划；Preparation of 5-year quipment Strategies; 有差距（设备策略只部分完成）Yes (Equipment trategies have only been partly completed) 确定设备策略的有效期并载入文件； Determine the validity of the Equipment Strategies and load files. 1.1有效期3年或1年在设备策略中注明alidity of 3 years or 1 year shall be indicated in Equipment Strategies 1.1没差距No 1.2 所有制定的策略在安全健康环保和效益与成本方面均应适当调整，并验证能够确保所有设想故障模式均获有效处理。 All prepared strategy shall be properly adjusted in fields like safety, health, environmental protection and benefit/cost, and shall be verified to ensure all assumed fault modes can be effectively handled. 1.2设备策略只列出常见的故障模式；Only common fault mode listed in Equipment Strategies. 1.2有差距（设想的故障模式不完全，没BCR）Yes (Assumed fault modes are not fully covered, no BCR) 6C.2 2．每个团队均应审查生产装置（或设施）的设备表，评估每一设备组件的重要性(重要程度)。满足此要求的主要步骤包括： List of equipment for operating unit/facility shall be reviewed by each team to assess the significance (degree of importance) of each equipment component. Key steps to meet this requirement including: 进行设备分级Performing equipment classification 有差距（运行预期值准确）Yes (xpected value of operation is correct) 2.1规定装置（或系统）的功能特性要求，包括运行预期值和机械完整性标准； Define functional performance requirements for the unit/system, including operating expected value and standards on mechanical integrity 2.1有部分预期值ome expected values. 2.2基于设备未能达到其功能要求的结果，就每一设备组件能够满足装置（或系统）整体目标(健康安全环保、质量和财务等方面的目标)的能力，确定其重要性。 Determ