EnergyEfficiencyforCalifornia,theUS,theWorldNo.1inthe.pptVIP

下载本文档

1
0
约2.65千字
约 14页
2016-09-28 发布于天津
举报
版权申诉

EnergyEfficiencyforCalifornia,theUS,theWorldNo.1inthe.ppt

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

EnergyEfficiencyforCalifornia,theUS,theWorldNo.1inthe.ppt

Energy Efficiency for California, the US, the WorldNo. 1 in the California “Loading Order” Arthur H. Rosenfeld, Commissioner California Energy Commission (916) 654-4930 ARosenfe@Energy.State.CA.US /commission/commissioners/rosenfeld.html or just Google “Art Rosenfeld” CO2 Conservation Supply Curves Explained Start with conservation supply curves for electricity or natural gas Net benefit = annual saved bills – annualized first cost of measure (of course saved bills depends on price of electricity). Then convert kWh or therms to CO2 See NAS “Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming” 1992, App. B Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming: Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming: Mitigation, Adaptation, and the Science Base (1992) Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP .../books/0309043867/html - 42k - Cached - Similar pages * Energy Intensity (E/GDP) in the United States (1949 - 2005) and France (1980 - 2003) 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 1949 1953 1957 1961 1965 1969 1973 1977 1981 1985 1989 1993 1997 2001 2005 thousand Btu/$ (in $2000) If intensity dropped at pre-1973 rate of 0.4%/year Actual (E/GDP drops 2.1%/year) France 12% of GDP = $1.7 Trillion 7% of GDP = $1.0 Trillion /Energy_Resources_Materials/ A_cost_curve_for_greenhouse_gas_reduction_abstract McKinsey Quarterly Source: David Goldstein In the United States 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 3 Gorges 三峡 Refrigerators 冰箱 Air Conditioners 空调 TWh 2000 Stds 2000 Stds 2005 Stds 2005 Stds If Energy Star If Energy Star TWH/Year 1.5 4.5 6.0 3.0 7.5 Value (billion $/year) Comparison of 3 Gorges to Refrigerator and AC Efficiency Improvements Savings calculated 10 years after standard takes effect. Calculations provided by David Fridley, LBNL Value of TWh 3 Gorges 三峡 Refrigerators 冰箱 Air Conditioners 空调 Wholesale (3 Gorges) at 3.6 c/kWh Retail (AC + Ref) at 7.2 c/kWh 三峡电量与电冰箱、空调能效对比标准生效后，10年节约电量 Based Upon Exhibit 11: Updated Estimates for 2020 for the Climate Strateg