criminaldivision-departmentofjustice.docVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
criminaldivision-departmentofjustice

SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA RECENT JUDGMENTS BULLETIN ISSUE NO. 6/2016 Below is a list of Victorian Supreme Court unreported judgments received in the Library from 4 to 15 April 2016. Catchwords are included when provided on the cover sheet of the unreported judgment. Enquires regarding unreported judgments can be forwarded to the Supreme Court Library at: sclib@supremecourt.vic.gov.au or telephone 03 9603 6282. TABLE OF CONTENTS Court of Appeal 1 Commercial Court 4 Common Law Division 6 Costs Court 11 Criminal Division 11 Court of Appeal APPEALS - Court of Appeal - Application for leave to appeal against decision of Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal - Whether Supreme Court Act 1986 s14A-s14D apply - Whether real prospect of success test in Supreme Court Act 1986 s14C applies - Comparison of real prospect of success test with test in Secretary to the Department of Premier and Cabinet v Hulls [1999] 3 VR 331 - Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 s148 - Ikosidekas v Karkanis [2015] VSCA 121 considered. STATUTORY INTERPRETATION - Legislative intention - Interpretation of two State Acts - Whether inconsistency arises - Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 s148 - Supreme Court Act 1986 s14A-s14D. JUDICIAL REVIEW - Application for leave to appeal against decision of Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal - Building contract - Applicants breach of contract resulted in slab heave and structural distress in respondents house - Whether Tribunal erred in assessing damages as cost of demolishing and rebuilding house - Whether Tribunal failed to provide adequate reasons - Bellgrove v Eldridge 1954 90 CLR 613, Tabcorp Holdings Ltd v Bowen Investments Pty Ltd 2009 236 CLR 272 and Kirkby v Coote [2006] QCA 61 applied - Leave to appeal granted - Appeal dismissed. WORDS AND PHRASES - civil appeal. Metricon Homes P/L ACN 005 108 752 v Softley, Earl Softley, Shelley Warren CJ, Tate JA, and Robson AJA [2016] VSCA 60 06/04/2016

文档评论(0)

maritime5 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档