A Comparative Study on College English Listening Course.ppt

A Comparative Study on College English Listening Course.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共22页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
A Comparative Study on College English Listening Course

The Effect of Autonomous-Assisted Classroom Teaching on College English Listening Ability Beijing Institute of Tourism Fan Guangli phyllisfan@ 1 Introduction The development of network-based multimedia technology brings opportunities to the teaching of college English listening course. Many journal articles are for the idea that traditional classroom teaching can not meet the versatile needs of the new era. Some (Tian, 2007, Cheng et al 2006) even set up zero class-hour teaching model, aiming at promoting students’ language ability and forming self-study habits. And Professor Su Dingfang (2004) proposes that autonomous learning can not merely be regarded as independent study. Phil Benson (2005) Practices associated with the development of autonomy can be classified under six broad headings. resource-based approaches, technology-based approaches, learner-based approaches, classroom-based approaches, teacher-based approaches. On the basis of analyzing -- traditional listening course and autonomous listening practice -- students background and their language base -- requirement of their future work the following 2 hypotheses are put forward: (1) The complimentary model is preferred to foster students’ listening ability when their English is relatively at lower level (2) The combination of formative and summative assessment will enhance students’ self management and autonomous learning ability 2 Methodology 2.1 Subject Non-English major 4 year full-time students, 54% art, 46% science. 36% as 1 priority, 20% as supplement, 44% has lower score. Lower self assessment    2.2 measurement 2 pairs of tests and a questionnaire 2.2.1 Pre-test vs. Level 1 Final Aims to decide the experimental group – 06 Management 3 (59) and 06 Food and Nutrition (64); and the control group – 06 Finance (61) and 06 Management 1 (64) Table 2: Level 1 Final 2.2.2 Level II Mid-term vs. Level II Final 2.3 Questionnaire 16 groups of multiple choice questions and 1 open question

文档评论(0)

didala + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档