Rhode Island Model Teacher Evaluation Support System.pptVIP

 * * * *  * * * * * * * * Step 2: Scoring a Set of SLOs Scoring Tables SLO 1 SLO 2 Final Exceeded Exceeded Exceptional Exceeded Met Full Exceeded Nearly Met Full Exceeded Not Met Partial Met Met Full Met Nearly Met Full Met Not Met Partial Nearly Met Nearly Met Partial Nearly Met Not Met Minimal Not Met Not Met Minimal p. 36 STEP 5: Rhode Island Growth Model Rating (when applicable) Professional Practice (PP) Rating Professional Responsibilities (PR) Rating Student Learning Objective Rating RI Growth Model Rating (When available) PP and PR Score Student Learning Score Final Rating STEP 6: Combine Scores to Determine a Final Effectiveness Rating Professional Practice (PP) Rating Professional Responsibilities (PR) Rating Student Learning Objective Rating RI Growth Model Rating (When available) PP and PR Score Student Learning Score Final Rating Final Effectiveness Rating Matrix p. 35 For more information, resources, and to download detailed documents, visit: /educatorquality/EducatorEvaluationQuestions? Comments? E-mail us at:EdEval@ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Professional Growth Plan Evaluation Conferences Ongoing reflection and planning Edition III: Evaluation and Support System Evaluation Criteria Support System Support and Development The Rhode Island Model is designed to support teacher development by: Outlining high expectations that are clear and aligned to school, district, and state priorities; Establishing a common vocabulary for meeting expectations; Encouraging student-focused conversations to share best practices, and address common challenges; Grounding teacher professional development in data-driven collaboration, conferencing, observation, and feedback to meet shared goals for student achievement; and Providing a reliable process for educators to focus practice and drive student learning. p. 8 Support and Development Three Evaluation Conferences Beginning, Middle, and End-