27 July R2P Discussion Paperdoc .doc

  1. 1、本文档共3页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
27 July R2P Discussion Paperdoc

NGO Strategy Discussion on Advancing the Responsibility to Protect Discussion paper for 27 july meeting hosted by Human Rights Watch, International Crisis Group, Oxfam International, World Federalist Movement-Institute for Global Policy Background The endorsement of the Responsibility to Protect R2P at the 2005 Summit was praised as a major step forward for the mobilization of earlier and more effective collective action in the face of war crimes, genocide, crimes against humanity. R2P has been welcomed by many as an agreement that sets out more clearly governments’ obligations to protect civilians, as well as a mechanism to hold governments accountable for their actions and inactions. The Security Council “reaffirmation” of responsibility to protect in Resolution 1674 on the protection of civilians is yet a further step toward codification of this important norm. Yet the responsibility to protect doctrine remains a controversial, particularly within the Security Council, as reflected in the months-long delay in acceptance of Resolution 1674, and the subsequent removal of the reference to responsibility to protect in the terms of reference of the Security Council mission to Darfur. The recent open debate on the protection of civilians reflected the spectrum of views on the subject. China’s statement included the following words of caution on R2P: [R]esolution 1674 2006 reaffirmed a principle expressed in the outcome document of last year’s summit General Assembly resolution 60/1 : the responsibility to protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity. China believes that that is not the same as the simple concept of the responsibility to protect, about which many countries continue to have concerns. The outcome document elaborated extensively on that concept. In-depth discussion of the issue should continue in the General Assembly so that differing opinions can be heard and doubts cleared up. In that role, the Sec

文档评论(0)

peain + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档