房山海网络成瘾青少年应对方式对比研究.docVIP

网络成瘾青少年应对方式的病例对照研究 房山海① 陶然① 张英① 卢子丽① 贺峰① 【】[1]调查和访谈，数据录入及统计用SPSS13.0软件，两组间比较用pearsonX2检验。结果：对各因子研究显示：网络成瘾青少年组积极应对的强度明显低于对照组；P均 0.05，网络成瘾青少年组的消极应对的因子：（生活中遇到不愉快事时）易迁怒于别人而经常发脾气；遇烦恼事很容易想悄悄哭一场；如果与人发生冲突宁可长期不理对方；在很长时回忆遇到不愉快事；遇苦恼事喜欢一个人独处。这五个因子均分高于对照组，存在显著性差异P均 0.05。结论：网络成瘾青少年生活中较少采用积极应对方式，较多采用遇苦恼时喜欢独处、发生冲突长期不理人、易迁怒别人发脾气、很容易想悄悄哭一场等消极的应对方式。 【】analyzed by spss13.0 and compared with pearson X2 test. Results: The study indicated that the active coping intensity of the internet addictive adolescent was evidently lower than the intensity of control group p 0.05 ,the scores of the passive coping factors about the internet addictive adolescent was evidently higher than the scores of control group and there were significant differences p 0.05 . The passive coping-styles of the internet addictive adolescent consist of five factors: they were more inclined to lose their temper when they were unhappy in their lives, they were more inclined to stealthily cry when they were worried, they were more inclined to be longtimely left to theirseves when there were conflicts, they recalled the disagreeable matter in a long time, they were more inclined to be on their own when they were troubled. Conclusion: The internet addictive adolescent were less inclined to adopt active coping-style, but more inclined to passive coping-style, for example, they were more inclined to be on their own, be longtimely left to theirseves, lose their temper, stealthily cry when they were worried or there were conflicts. 【Key words】internet addiction; case-control study; adolescent; coping-style 1、对象和方法： 1.1对象： 选取自2006年10月—2007年1月在我院住院的网络成瘾青少年78例（在128例中随机抽选），男性70人，女性8人，年龄16—19岁，平均年龄17±1岁，受教育程度从初三到高三。均符合网络成瘾的诊断标准[2]。遵循随机抽样的原则，选择中学生90名健康者作为对照组（在北京、广东两所高级中学两个班级发放问卷110份，收到有效问卷90份）。两组研究对象在性别、年龄、民族、受教育程度等方面，经X2检验无显著性差异（P 0.05），且均不符合网瘾的诊断标准[2]。 1.2方法： 采用姜乾金.刘小青.吴根富编制的特质应对方式问卷（该问卷共设20个因子，包括积极应对10个，消极应对10个）和访谈法。在对各因子对比研究中，将积极应对因子和消极应对因子的评分从不是、偶尔、有时、经常到总是都分为5个等级（1~5分），总分是每个被试者的各相同因子分之和。 1.3统计方法： 采用SPSS13.0统计软件建立数据库，