美赛论文优秀模版.docVIP

For office use only T1 ________________ T2 ________________ T3 ________________ T4 ________________ Team Control Number11111 ? Problem ChosenABCD For office use only F1 ________________ F2 ________________ F3 ________________ F4 ________________ 2015Mathematical Contest in Modeling (MCM/ICM) Summary Sheet In order to evaluate the performance of a coach, we describe metrics in five aspects: historical record, game gold content, playoff performance, honors and contribution to the sports. Moreover, each aspect is subdivided into several secondary metrics. Take playoff performance as example, we collect postseason result (Sweet Sixteen, Final Four, etc.) per year from NCAA official website, Wikimedia and so on. First, ****grade. To eval*** , in turn, are John Wooden, Mike Krzyzewski, Adolph Rupp, Dean Smith and Bob Knight. Time line horizon does make a difference. According to turning points in NCAA history, we divide the previous century into six periods with different time weights which lead to the change of ranking. We conduct sensitivity analysis on FSE to find best membership function and calculation rule. Sensitivity analysis on aggregation weight is also performed. It proves AM performs better than single model. As a creative use, top 3 presidents (U.S.) are picked out: Abraham Lincoln, George Washington, Franklin D. Roosevelt. At last, the strength and weakness of our mode are discussed, non-technical explanation is presented and the future work is pointed as well. Key words: Ebola virus disease; Epidemiology; West Africa; ****** Contents I. Introduction 2 1.1 2 1.2 2 1.3 2 1.4 2 1.5 2 1.6 2 II. The Description of the Problem 3 2.1 How do we approximate the whole course of paying toll? 3 2.2 How do we define the optimal configuration? 3 2.3 The local optimization and the overall optimization 3 2.4 The differences in weights and sizes of vehicles 3 2.5 What if there is no data available? 3 III. Mode