Combinedapplication of Product Lifecycle and Software Configuration Management systems for ITER rem.doc
- 1、本文档共6页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Combinedapplication of Product Lifecycle and Software Configuration Management systems for ITER rem
Preparing project managers to deal with complexity – Advanced project management education??Original Research ArticleInternational Journal of Project Management
This study provides a review of important issues for ‘Building Information Modelling’ (BIM) tools and standards and comprehensive recommendations for their advancement and development that may improve BIM technologies and provide a basis for inter-operability, integration, model-based communication, and collaboration in building projects.
Based on a critical review of Building Product Modelling, including the development of standards for exchange and the features of over 150 AEC/O (Architecture, Engineering, Construction, and Operation) tools and digital models, a methodological framework is proposed for improvements to both BIM tools and schemata. The features relevant to the framework were studied using a conceptual process model and a ‘BIM System-of-Systems’ (BIM-SoS) model. The development, implementation, and use of the BIM Schema are analysed from the standpoint of standardisation.
The results embrace the requirements for a BIM research methodology, with an example of methods and procedures, an RD review with critique, and a multi-standpoint framework for developments with concrete recommendations, supported by BIM metrics, upon which the progress of tools, models, and standards may be measured, evaluated, streamlined, and judged. It is also proposed that any BIM Schema will never be ‘completed’ but should be developed as evolutionary ontology by ‘segmented standpoint models’ to better account for evolving tools and AEC/O practices.
Article Outline
1. Introduction
1.1. The role of standards for BIM
1.2. Study scope and goals
2. Methodology
2.1. Literature and software review
2.2. The process centred and systems-thinking approach
2.3. Structure of the paper
3. Definitions of standpoints
3.1. ‘BIM Model’ and ‘BIM Schema’ from the standpoint of a ‘model’
3.2. ‘BIM Model’ and ‘BIM Schema’ from the st
文档评论(0)