会议海报制作技巧.pptx

International Conferences and Paper WritingWeek 8 Session BGood Morning and Welcome to Class!November 13 and 14, 2014 ICAPW classes 3, 8, 12 and 16Dr. Histand/project/posters/index.htmlContextThis poster was presented a the annual Zoology Department Symposium for graduate students at North Carolina State University.?It won the award for best poster presentation at the symposium.Positive PointsThe title conveys the main message instantly.Context and objectives are made clear.Methods are concise.Graphs are interpreted by their titles. One can read the titles and trust the authors, or examine the graphs in more detail.Results and conclusions are concise and relate back to objectives.Color scheme is very simple and pleasing.Font is large enough everywhere, including figures.?Negative PointsResults and conclusions do not relate back to context (Introduction). It would be nice to see a statement of how the findings relate to aquaculture.Some viewers have noted that the title could me more direct:Water Temperature Determines Sex of Southern FlounderTitle font is on the small side - could be larger.Some viewers have felt there is too much white space between the columns. It could be reduced somewhat, but not too much. Doing so would also allow fonts to be made a little larger.ContextThis poster was presented as class project in the final poster session for Modeling Biological Systems at NC State University.Positive PointsNice, attention-grabbing graphic (the lion).Large title.Font is easy to ready, even in figures.Headings everyone will understand - clear organization.Author identified with complete contact information (lower left corner).?Negative PointsPoster seems a bit text heavy and unbalanced (all figures in upper right).Hard to read text over the lion graphic - lack of contrast, changing contrast, confusing lines.Title is not very informative.Titles on graphics are not very informative (Gene Effect 1, Gene Effect 2 ...) -- could have named the effects and used them a