文献综述样本(全).doc

本 科 生 毕 业 论 文（设计） 文　献　综　述 从操控论看林纾的《黑奴吁天录》 学生姓名 学 号 指导教师 二级学院 外国语学院 专业名称 英语 班 级 2011年11月 The Literature Review of A Study of Lin Shu’s Heinu Yu Tian Lu from Manipulation Theory Perspective Lin Shu is a renowned man of letters as well as translator in the late Qing Dynasty. But he is remembered more for his translation efforts than his other achievements because these works exerted great influence on the society then. What is special about Lin Shu is that he was a monolingual and hence had to collaborate with others who were fluent in foreign languages during translating. That is why Lin Shu has been studied and commented on by so many scholars for a long time. When it comes to the study of translation, one is sure to think of the widely known traditional criterion “faithfulness, expressiveness and elegance” put forward by Yan Fu. But as far as this criterion is concerned, Lin Shu is always heavily criticized since he made a lot of changes in many of his translation works. However, the “cultural turn” that occurred in the 1970s provides us with new perspectives in the study of translation. More and more scholars have realized that Lin Shu did not make the changes for no reason. They tend to explore his works from new perspectives and focus on the ideological, cultural, historical and other reasons why Lin Shu should make such alternations. 1. Previous Studies on Lin Shu’s Translation While Lin Shu’s was alive, many scholars had commented upon his translation. But a number of them tended to criticize him. In 1918, Liu Bannong(刘半农), in his “Reply to Wang Jingxuan’s letter”(《复王敬轩书》) (薛绥之 张俊才，2010:’s translation. Liu’s criticism mainly focused on Lin Shu’s bad selection of the original works, mistranslations, lack of refinement in language and so on. After Lin Shu’s death, in 1924, Zheng Zhenduo(郑振铎) gave a fair and objective comment on Lin’s translation in Mr Lin Qinnan(《林琴南先生)( 薛绥之 张俊才，2010:133-145’s translation efforts and evalu