老年冠心病患者心脏康复治疗的基本概念.ppt

老年冠心病患者心脏康复治疗的基本概念.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共34页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
HM734 Exercise Testing and Prescription: Cardiorespiratory * Actuarial cumulative hazard plot for survival time based on depression status upon completion of cardiac rehabilitation Depressed Non-depressed 0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0 1 2 3 4 5 Time (Years) Depression is Associated with Decreased Survival Milani RV, Am J Med 2007 HM734 Exercise Testing and Prescription: Cardiorespiratory * Prevalence of Depression Before and After Cardiac Rehab 23% 19% 30 20 0 Young Elderly 10 6% 4% Before After Lavie CF, Arch Int Med, 2006 Psychological Distress is Common HM734 Exercise Testing and Prescription: Cardiorespiratory * 34 HM734 Exercise Testing and Prescription: Cardiorespiratory * * * * * So these are the people that we envisage should be involved with secondary prevenion according to the NSF for CHD. * RFA list Family * Cumulative Kaplan-Meier estimates of the rates of key study end points during the follow-up period among 3241 patients with recent myocardial infarction (MI). A, Data for the primary composite end point (cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, and hospitalization for angina pectoris, heart failure, or urgent revascularization procedure). The hazard ratio (HR) for the intensive intervention, compared with usual care, for the primary efficacy end point at the study end was 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-1.04; P?=?.12). B, Data for the secondary efficacy end point (death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke). The HR for the intensive intervention, compared with usual care, for the primary efficacy end point at the study end was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.47-0.95; P?=?.02). C, Data for the secondary efficacy end point (cardiac death plus nonfatal MI). The HR for the intensive intervention, compared with usual care, for the primary efficacy end point at the study end was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.43-0.94; P?=?.02). D, Data for the secondary efficacy end point (fatal plus nonfatal stroke). The HR for the intensive in

文档评论(0)

enxyuio + 关注
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档