血管性认知障碍的诊治新进展-__培训课件.ppt

血管性认知障碍的诊治新进展-__培训课件.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共71页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Thalamic infarct Fig. 2 Thalamic infarct in a 58-year-old man with dementia. a Axial FLAIR MR image shows infarct in the left dominant thalamus (arrow). There are also periventricular and deep white matter hyperintensities and global mild cerebral atrophy. b Coronal 3D SPGR T1-weighted MR image confirms the thalamic infarct and the cerebral atrophy. It also shows mild bilateral hippocampal atrophy. The white matter abnormalities are difficult to see as periventricular hypointensities (arrows) Neuroradiology. 2007;49(1):1-22. VCI的诊治新进展 VCI的定义/诊断标准 VCI的神经心理学评估 VCI的影像学诊断 如何确定影像学与认知损害的关系 VCI的治疗进展 小结 VCI的治疗 VCI治疗首先应给于病因治疗。出现症状时可给于对症治疗药物 针对血管因素以防治卒中的治疗 特异针对提高认知水平的药物治疗 加强康复训练、积极开展非药物治疗 血管危险因素/脑血管病变是VCI的起始环节 危险因素 首要病理学 血管改变 终末期结果 中间因素 后果 认知功能损害 高血压,糖尿病,吸烟,高脂血症,炎症 动脉粥样硬化,动脉僵硬度,内皮损伤 小血管病 血管/管腔狭窄 心功能不全 腔隙性梗死 关键部位梗死 慢性低灌注 自主调节损伤 高白质信号 基因(ApoE, Notch3) AD病理学 Stroke. 2011;42:221-226. VCI的危险因素控制推荐 In people at risk for VCI, smoking cessation is reasonable (Class IIa; Level of Evidence A). In people at risk for VCI, the following lifestyle interventions may be reasonable: moderation of alcohol intake (Class IIb; Level of Evidence B); weight control (Class IIb; Level of Evidence B); and physical activity (Class IIb; Level of Evidence B). 3. In people at risk for VCI, the use of antioxidants and B vitamins is not beneficial, based on current evidence (Class III; Level of Evidence A). Lifestyle Factors Stroke, 2011;42(9):2672-713. VCI的危险因素控制推荐 In people at risk for VCI, treatment of hypertension is recommended (Class I; Level of Evidence A). In people at risk for VCI, treatment of hyperglycemia may be reasonable (Class IIb; Level of Evidence C). In people at risk for VCI, treatment of hypercholesterolemia may be reasonable (Class IIb; Level of Evidence B). In people at risk for VCI, it is uncertain whether treatment of inflammation will reduce such risk (Class IIb; Level of Evidence C). Physiological Risk Factors Stroke, 2011;42(9):2672-713. Va

文档评论(0)

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档