m i c r o- f o u n d a t i o n s i n s t r a t e g i c m a n a g e m e n t(m i f c r o - o u n d t i o n s i n s t r t e g i c m n a g e m e n t).doc

m i c r o- f o u n d a t i o n s i n s t r a t e g i c m a n a g e m e n t(m i f c r o - o u n d t i o n s i n s t r t e g i c m n a g e m e n t).doc

  1. 1、本文档共18页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
MICRO-FOUNDATIONS IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT: SQUARING COLEMAN’S DIAGRAM Jack Vromen EIPE Erasmus University Rotterdam Vromen@fwb.eur.nl 1. Introduction In a series of joint papers (Felin and Foss 2005, 2006; Abell et al. 2007; Felin and Hesterly 2007), Teppo Felin and Nicolai J. Foss recently launched a microfoundations project in the field of strategic management. Felin and Foss argue that extant explanations in strategic management are predominantly collectivist. In these explanations, routines and organizational capabilities, which are taken to be properties of firms (and hence are situated at the collective, or ‘macro’, rather than at the individual or ‘micro’ level), figure prominently. In the extant literature in strategic management, routines and organizational capabilities sometimes are explananda in explanations (e.g., when they are seen as outcomes of organizational learning). At other times they are explanantia in explanations (e.g., when firm behavior and firm performance are seen as outcomes of routines or capabilities that are in operation). In both cases the explanations remain at the collective level: phenomena or events at the collective level are explained in terms of other phenomena or events at the collective level. The explanations do not refer to what is going on at the underlying individual (or ‘micro’) level. This is a significant deficiency of the explanations, Felin and Foss argue, for it is clear that individual agents and their actions and interactions play a crucial, indispensable role not only in how routines and organizational capabilities originate in the first place, in how they are subsequently maintained, revised or replaced, but also in how routines and organizational capabilities affect firm behavior and firm performance. Felin and Foss’s microfoundations project is meant to repair this deficiency: more attention should be paid to exactly how individual agents and their actions and interactions are involved in the emergence

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

bgl001 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档