ppt课件-cpucavoidedcostworkshop-environmentaleconomics.pptVIP

ppt课件-cpucavoidedcostworkshop-environmentaleconomics.ppt

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
ppt课件-cpucavoidedcostworkshop-environmentaleconomics

CPUC Avoided Cost Workshop Environmental Externality Avoided Cost Emissions Comment Areas Value of emissions is being double-counted Avoided costs should not include a value for reduced CO2 emissions Emissions Evaluation Framework Air Pollutants Considered Working Group Recommendation Focus on NOx, CO2 and PM-10 NOx is most actively traded emission species in CA, 6% from power plants, direct gas CO2 is not regulated in US (yet), int’l trade emerging, about 30% from power plants, gas PM-10 increase due to CT generation, 1% from power plants, PM-2.5 may be an issue SO2, CO, HCs not likely to be significant Calculating the Externality Adder Environmental Adder = S tons/MWh * $/ton (emission intensity * externality value) Emission intensity depends on the energy source that is at the margin (short-term and/or long-term), in terms of fuel source, plant age, heat rate, and emission control technology The marginal source is determined by the other proposed analytic methods Level of Adder for Emissions Resulting Emissions Adder by Heat Rate Approach to CO2 Emission Cost Value CO2 emission costs are not externalities, but rather a present value of projected future emission costs Direct emission abatement not feasible at present Emission reduction costs range from $2/ton-CO2 (forestry and land use) to $50/ton-CO2 (solar power) Markets emerging, not yet mature, especially in U.S. Recent market costs: EU ETS $7-14/ton-CO2, UK ETS $4-20/ton-CO2, Dutch CERs $4-8/ton-CO2, World Bank PCF $3-12/ton-CO2 Oregon CT $1-4/ton-CO2 Must also rely on studies that project future marginal costs and market trading prices Model estimates of emission stabilization (no trading) and Kyoto compliance (with trading) range from $5 to $69/ton-CO2, with a median value around 17 /ton-CO2 Discounting a future stream of project emission cost values back to 2004 resutls in a value of $8/ton-CO2 Why Include CO2 for Efficiency? Likely development of CO2 emissions limits on stationary sources over the ti

文档评论(0)

bgl001 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档