OSPARdiffusepollution培训讲义.pptVIP

OSPAR Guidelines for diffuse pollution A modelling application on ICReW study site - Montargil catchment Introduction Large amount of data is needed to model nutrient transport at watershed level Often data sets are incomplete in space and/or time Simulations made with these data could originate bad results Appling first a Harmonized Quantification Procedure to estimate nutrient loads allows: Evaluate consistency of available data Obtain reference values to compare with model results Overview Introduction to Harmonized Quantification Procedures for Nutrients (HARP - OSPAR Guidelines) - Basic concepts Application to Montargil basin: Hypothesis assumed in each guideline Identification of main sources of nutrients Comparing results of source oriented approach and load oriented approach Simple calculation of diffuse sources Concepts – Riverine Load Estimation can be made based in measures of flow and concentration Calculation of riverine load based in sources Where LT - Riverine load Vol – Monthly drained volume (normally known) Cm - Average Monthly concentration (normally known) Calculation of riverine load based in sources Calculation of riverine load based in sources Where LT - Riverine load SP - Point source (normally known) SD - Diffuse source (can be estimated) R - Retention (can be estimated) Ospar framework approach Monitored and UnMonitored area of the catchment Ospar guidelines hypothesis Nitrogen and Phosphorus was calculated in Guidelines 3, 4 and 5 considering that each population equivalent corresponded to 12gN/day of N and 2.5gP/day of P In Guideline 6 SWAT model was used to estimate diffuse pollution For guideline 7, equation was used. Ospar guidelines hypothesis Retention in Guideline 9 was calculated using: Results of the Harmonised Quantification Procedures Source Orientated Approach vs Load Orientated Approach G1 - Quantification procedure for “Source Orientated Approach” G1 – Comparing “Source Orientated Approach” and “Load