- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
整形手术男性乳腺发育症患者心理的研究
刘晨 栾杰 丛中 柳春明 李桂珍
[摘要] 目的 了解整形的心理状态,探讨整形手术心理状态的。方法 采用焦虑自评量表、抑郁自评量表、自尊量表、体像障碍自评量表及艾森克人格问卷,对名者手术前后的心理状态进行问卷调查,分析调查结果。 结果 在名者中,术前焦虑、抑郁状态分别为5%%;手术前33.685±6.543、34.338±5.414和23.487±7.441,术后分别为26.442±4.278(P0.05)、27.968±7.112(P0.05)和16.184±8.544(P0.05)。患者术后分值较术前上升5.869±6.197 (P0.01)中的和量表的分值在常态范围之内,L表的分值超出常态标准结论[关键词] 整形美容手术 心理The preliminary research on the influence of the plastic and aesthetic surgery on the psychology of the patients with gynaecomastia Liu Chen, Luan Jie, Cong Zhong, et al. Department of plastic surgery of 301 Hospital and Postgraduate Medical College of P.L.A., Beijing,100853, China; Plastic Surgery Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100041, China; Department of Psychology, Beijing University, Beijing 100083, China.
[Abstract] Objective: The aim of this research was to identify the psychology of the patients with gynaecomastia, to study the influence of the plastic and aesthetic surgery on their psychology. Method: The self-rating anxiety scale(SAS), the self-rating depression scale(SDS), the self-esteem scale(SES),the self- rating body dysmorphic disorder(BDD) scale, and the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ) were used to determine the psychology of the 65 patients with gynaecomastia. These patients were tested preoperatively and postoperatively, respectively, and then the results were analyzed. Results: Of the 65 patients with gynaecomastia who completed these tests, it was found that the 54 percent were in anxiety preoperatively, 57 percent were in depression, and 14 percent were in BDD preoperatively. The scores in SAS, SDS, and self- rating BDD scale were 33.685±6.543, 34.338±5.414, and 23.487±7.441 preoperatively, respectively; and those were 26.442±4.278 (P0.05), 27.968±7.112 (P0.05), and 16.184±8.544 (P0.05). The scores in SES increased by 5.869±6.197 (P0.01) postoperatively. The scores in E scale, P scale, and N scale of EPQ were normal, and those in L scale were abnormal. The differences betw
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 一种窄冠带条多层缠绕搭接量计算方法及应用.pdf VIP
- 2025年融媒体中心全媒体记者招聘考试笔试试题(附答案).docx VIP
- L10010022《病理学》课程标准.pdf VIP
- 【必备收藏】幼儿建构区游戏指导完整版课件-.pptx VIP
- 主题策略-【专题报告】CANSLIM4.0策略:叠加企业生命周期.docx VIP
- 最新人教版九年级化学演示、分组实验统计表.xls VIP
- GB 50797-2012 光伏发电站设计规范.docx VIP
- 插画设计-PPT课件(全).pptx
- 古代牝户手抄本雨花香PPT课件.pptx VIP
- 【大单元整体教学设计】人教版初中化学九年级上册 第三单元物质构成的奥秘 课题1 分子和原子.doc VIP
文档评论(0)