- 1、本文档共10页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
临床路径在计划性剖宫产中的应用
临床路径在计划性剖宫产中的应用李 丹,朱义保,赵 菲,万凌玲,郑九生,刘 淮( 江西省妇幼保健院,江西 南昌 330006)【摘要】 目的: 探讨卫生部试行的临床路径管理在我院计划性剖宫产中的应用效果。方法: 选取 185 例已实施临床路径管理的计划性剖宫产孕妇( 路径组) 和 96 例未实施临床路径管理的计划性剖宫产孕妇( 对照组) ,对两组孕妇的住院天数、各种住院费用、各项指标的变异系数和构成比,以及患者的满意度和术后并发症等指标进行综合比较分析。结果: 路径组住院天数比对照组缩短,差异有高度统计学意义( P = 0. 00) ,但住院总费用两组比较,差异无统计学意义( P =0. 19) ; 对于住院总费用的构成变化,路径组药费下降,但治疗费增加,两组间的药费和治疗费比较,差异均有统计学意义( P<0. 05) ; 路径组变异系数波动总体较对照组小,患者满意度有所提高,但术后并发症率无明显改变。结论: 临床路径应用于我院计划性剖宫产起到了规范医疗行为的作用。【关键词】 临床路径; 计划性剖宫产; 医疗费用; 变异系数; 满意度中图分类号: R719. 8 文献标识码: AApplication of Clinical Pathway in Scheduled Caesarean SectionLI Dan,ZHU Yibao,ZHAO Fei,et al( Jiangxi Maternal and Child Care Hospital,Nanchang Jiangxi 330006,China)Corresponding author: LIU Huai【Abstract】 Objective: To evaluate the effect of clinical pathway tried out by the Ministry of Public Health inthe scheduled caesarean section. Methods: 185 cases with scheduled caesarean section were selected clini-cal pathway ( Pathway group) . 96 cases were selected non clinical pathway as control group. The time ofhospitalization,various medical care costs,coefficient of variation and constituent ratio of different parame-ters,and patient’s satisfaction degree as well as their complications after operation were analyzed and com-pared between the two groups. Results: The time of hospitalization in pathway group was shorter than that incontrol group. There was statistical difference between them( P = 0. 00) . There was no statistical differencebetween them about medical care costs( P =0. 19) . In pathway group,the constituent ratio of medical carecost was changed. The drug costs were decreased,but the treatment costs were increased. There was sta-tistical difference among two groups about drug and treatment costs( P<0. 05) . Compared to control group,the coefficient of variation in pathway group was smaller than control group,and the patient’s satisfactorydegree was increased,but there was no obvious changes about complications after operation. Conclusions:Clinical pathway app
文档评论(0)