- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
filed82412bartoniv.americanmedicalresponseca12
Filed 8/24/12 Bartoni v. American Medical Response CA1/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
LAURA BARTONI et al.,
Plaintiffs and Respondents,
v.
AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE WEST,
Defendant and Appellant.
A130333
(Alameda County
Super. Ct. No. R
JCCP NO. 4604)
INTRODUCTION
Defendant American Medical Response West (AMR West) appeals from an order of the Alameda County Superior Court denying its motion to compel arbitration of wage and hour claims by current and former employees, alleging statutory and state law violations regarding meal periods, rest breaks, and overtime pay. Defendant contends the trial court erred in refusing to compel arbitration of plaintiffs’ wage and hours claims, where it determined the collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) between the union and defendant did not contain a “clear and unmistakable” waiver of plaintiffs’ right to a judicial forum for their statutory claims.
Plaintiffs counter that the court’s order denying the motion to compel arbitration should be affirmed, not only on the ground stated by the superior court, but also because the CBA procedures failed to meet minimum standards for an adequate forum to vindicate statutory rights; because defendant’s motion was flawed, in that the unions were not parties to the underlying action and the trial court had no power to order arbitration as sought in defendant’s motion; because defendant waived any right to seek arbitration by delaying its motion for two and one-half years and then exploited its delay by using the judicial forum to conduct
您可能关注的文档
- chinesechildren'sperceptionofpersonalandcommercial.doc
- commonwealthofmassachusetts.doc
- communityengagement.doc
- confessiontojesuitsno27thetreatyofveronakept.doc
- confuciusinstituteatportlandstateuniversity.doc
- consultationin-personfeedbackcollection.docx
- contentsjuly2011.doc
- copyright2012bytheamericaninstituteofarchitects(.doc
- countryargentinaar.doc
- csisection092400–portlandcementplaster.docx
- fingerprint+keypadlock指纹锁.doc
- fireproofingpracticesin.doc
- fmea&spc&msa失效模式分析、统计过程控制与测量系统.doc
- formoreinformation,pleasecontact.docx
- graduatecertificateintesol.doc
- graphicalhazardgenerationvalidtimeeventcode.doc
- guidelinesforfoodwastedisposal.docx
- henanlansenenvironmentalprotection.doc
- hf3fs系列饲料粉碎机养殖饲料粉碎机设备成套设备.doc
文档评论(0)