UpdatedMIMOproposalSamsungElectronics.pptVIP

November 2005 Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT November 2005 doc.: IEEE 802.22-yy/xxxxr0 Ashish Pandharipande, SAIT Updated MIMO proposalSamsung Electronics IEEE P802.22 Wireless RANs Date: 2006-01-18 MIMO Contribution Motivations for MIMO Link reliability improvement (diversity or beamforming). Range extension (diversity or beamforming). Improvement of WRAN cell coverage across the TV spectrum due to the scalability of the number of antennas with frequency at the same time as channel propagation properties degrade. Space Division Multiple Access (SDMA) by closed-loop multiuser MIMO (CL MU MIMO) for throughput enhancement. Better spectral efficiency. Enhanced coexistence by reducing required over-the-air time allowed by higher peak rates and/or lower average delay per packet. Enhanced coexistence by reducing the required CPE transmit power to achieve a target data rate. Possible interference cancellation or nulling of interferers, as well as creating nulls towards incumbents (e.g. Part 74 devices). Reminders on MIMO Advantages of MIMO come without transmit power nor bandwidth increase. Only expenses are: computation complexity at baseband, which can be very limited if linear solutions are employed (and much lower than some other system parts). Additional hardware (antennas, RF front-ends) Other issues (signaling overhead,…) are not a concern, as proved by the adoption of MIMO in many IEEE and non-IEEE standards. Feasibility discussion 1 to 5 antenna elements are feasible with an overall stride not exceeding 1.5 m Can be installed at the BS and at CPEs Beamforming processing is performed in the baseband domain Typical non-LOS operation justifies sufficient scaterring around CPE to provide independent fading Multiple antennas independent fading is more problematic at the BS, but it could be available in suburban or urban areas (at the same time as a larger customer base) Multiuser MIMO techniques are feasible even in correlated channels Coverage an