THE CORPORATISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION A QUESTION OF BALANCE一个平衡的问题高等教育的公司化.pptVIP

下载本文档

2
0
约1.6万字
约 26页
2017-03-09 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

THE CORPORATISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION A QUESTION OF BALANCE一个平衡的问题高等教育的公司化.ppt

1、本文档共26页，可阅读全部内容。
2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
5、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
6、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
7、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

THE CORPORATISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION A QUESTION OF BALANCE一个平衡的问题高等教育的公司化

ATEM QLD May 26, 2006 COMPARISON OF ACADEMIC AND NON-ACADEMIC STAFF - A QUESTION OF BALANCE DON SANDERSON QUT A comparison of academic and non-academic staff perceptions of higher education changes using a competing values framework: A question of balance Don Sanderson Queensland University of Technology Vivaldi: The Four Seasons (from The Trial Between Harmony Invention) Overview of Presentation“Kites Compasses” Focus of presentation Methodology Results Discussion Foci Loss of human relations values felt more acutely by non-academic staff Academic staff and non-academic staff numbers – balance and imbalance Change and higher education Corporatisation Losses and gains ‘Them and us’ “When the literature on higher education draws on such work, it generally contrasts administrators’ and professionals’ different bases of authority (position versus expertise) and aims of control (accountability versus autonomy)” … and the danger is that administrators can be cast as ‘villains’” (Rhoades Slaughter, 1991, p. 189). An untenable polemic Polemic is too simplistic. It is more likely that organisational participants operate in dual or multiple capacities, across value structures or paradigms. Methodology Method Triangulation Participants Limitations Interview participants (n = 12) The Competing Values Framework (CVF) Quadrant strength by attribute frequency: Both groups Academic and Non-Academic groups - Interviews Survey resultsRespondent groups rating by culture type Academic and Non-Academic groups - Survey Comparison between Interview and Survey Academics Comparison between Interview and Survey Non-Academics Comparison of Academic and Non-Academic groups: Model strength All respondents Ohio State University Extension Point 2. Balancing numbers Study research Case study Other organisations Research Halfond reports that in the US over the period 1975 to 1990, “EEOC figures show, student enrollment has risen 10 percent and