Timelapse seismic modelling for Pikes Peak field时间推移地震模拟派克峰场.pptVIP

Integration of reservoir simulation with time-lapse seismic modeling Ying Zou, Laurence R. Bentley, and Laurence R. Lines Objectives OUTLINE Theory and methodology Geology and geophysical background of Pikes Peak heavy oil field Reservoir production activity and reservoir model Reservoir simulation results Synthetic time-lapse seismic sections Conclusions Future work Acknowledgements Theory and methodology Ko, Kg, Kw, and rf from Batzle and Wang (1992) average of: Kf=1/(So/Ko+Sg/Kg+Sw/Kw) Kf= (SoKo+SgKg+SwKw) Gassmann equation: Ku = Kd + (1- Kd/Ks)2 / [ f/Kf + (1-f)/Kf –Kd/Ks2] m Kd no change with fluid content Geology and geophysics of Pikes Peak heavy oil field Reservoir production activity Reservoir Model Reservoir simulation resultsReservoir history matching Reservoir simulation results3D Temperature change Reservoir simulation results3D Pressure change Reservoir simulation resultsReservoir oil saturation change Reservoir simulation results  Reservoir temperature change Reservoir simulation resultsReservoir gas saturation change Reservoir simulation resultsReservoir pressure change Synthetic seismic sections Model construction Synthetic seismic sections synthetic seismic section in 1981 Synthetic seismic sections synthetic seismic section in 1991 Synthetic seismic sections synthetic seismic section in 2000 Synthetic seismic sections Difference between 1991 and 1981 Synthetic seismic sections Difference between 2000 and 1991 Conclusions Gas saturation is the dominant factor for seismic change Thicker gas zone corresponds to more time delay on seismic section High temperature regions correspond to regions of seismic difference energy Pressure propagation is much faster than temperature Future work Include the moduli dependence on effective stress (reservoir pressure) Compare seismic survey results to synthetic results Modify reservoir model to improve the match between