- 11
- 0
- 约4.6千字
- 约 15页
- 2017-03-09 发布于上海
- 举报
WorstCase Optimal Redistribution of VCG Payments最坏情况下的最优分配VCG支付
Complexity of unweighted coalitional manipulationunder some common voting rules Voting Manipulation Manipulation: a voter (manipulator) casts a vote that is not her true preference, to make herself better off. A voting rule is strategy-proof if there is never a (beneficial) manipulation under this rule Manipulation under plurality rule (ties are broken in favor of ) Gibbard-Satterthwaite Theorem [Gibbard 73, Satterthwaite 75] When there are at least 3 alternatives, there is no strategy-proof voting rule that satisfies the following conditions: Non-imposition: every alternative wins under some profile Non-dictatorship: there is no voter such that we always choose that voter’s most preferred alternative Computational complexity as a barrier against manipulation Second order Copeland and STV are NP-hard to manipulate [Bartholdi et al. 89, Bartholdi Orlin 91] Many hybrids of voting rules are NP-hard to manipulate [Conitzer Sandholm 03, Elkind and Lipmaa 05] Many common voting rules are hard to manipulate for weighted coalitional manipulation [Conitzer et al. 07] All of these are worst-case results: it could be that most instances are easy to manipulate Some evidence that this is indeed the case [Procaccia Rosenschein 06, Conitzer Sandholm 06, Zuckerman et al. 08, Friedgut et al 08, Xia Conitzer 08a, Xia Conitzer 08b] Unweighted coalitional manipulation (UCM) problem Given a voting rule r the non-manipulators’ profile PNM alternative c preferred by the manipulators number of manipulators |M| We are asked whether or not there exists a profile PM (of the manipulators) such that c is the winner of PNM∪PM under r Problem is defined for unique winner and co-winner Complexity results about UCM Maximin For any alternatives c1≠c2, any profile P, let DP(c1, c2)=|{R∈P: c1Rc2}| - |{R∈P: c2Rc1}| Maximin(P)=argmaxc{minc DP(c, c)} Theorem [McGarvey 53] For any D:{(c1, c2): c1≠c2}→N (where the values in the range have the same parity, i.e., either all odd or all even
您可能关注的文档
- Why Oh Y HS2 grand projet, great delusion or 为什么哦Y HS2 大项目、大妄想或.ppt
- Why Parents NHLBI, NIH为什么父母或NIH.ppt
- Why should I go to Graduate School CBSEUCSC我为什么要去读研cbseucsc.ppt
- Why Single Dish Darrel Emerson NRAO Tucson naic为什么单碟达雷尔艾默生NRAO图森奈克.ppt
- Why Some People Give Up The Good Teacher为什么有些人放弃了好老师.ppt
- Why Should Anyone Be Led By You Dansk Erhverv为什么有人带领你该erhverv.ppt
- Why surf alone Exploring the Web with reconnaissance agents为什么冲浪独自探索网络与侦察代理人.ppt
- Why Use Slow Release Fertilizers为什么使用缓释肥料.ppt
- Why Use RSIGuard为什么使用RSIGuard.ppt
- Why the West University of Wisconsin–Green Bay为何是威斯康星大学绿湾.ppt
- 2025-2026学年天津市和平区高三(上)期末数学试卷(含解析).pdf
- 2025-2026学年云南省楚雄州高三(上)期末数学试卷(含答案).pdf
- 2025-2026学年甘肃省天水市张家川实验中学高三(上)期末数学试卷(含答案).docx
- 2025-2026学年福建省厦门市松柏中学高二(上)期末数学试卷(含答案).docx
- 2025-2026学年广西钦州市高一(上)期末物理试卷(含答案).docx
- 2025-2026学年河北省邯郸市临漳县九年级(上)期末化学试卷(含答案).docx
- 2025-2026学年河北省石家庄二十三中七年级(上)期末历史试卷(含答案).docx
- 2025-2026学年海南省五指山市九年级(上)期末化学试卷(含答案).docx
- 2025-2026学年河北省唐山市玉田县九年级(上)期末化学试卷(含答案).docx
- 2025-2026学年河北省邢台市市区九年级(上)期末化学试卷(含答案).docx
最近下载
- 高等学校中医临床教学基地教学工作水平评估指标体系与标准.pdf
- 2022届高考物理一轮复习图像经典100题.pdf VIP
- 新能源汽车电气技术 配套课件.pptx
- 2025年高考语文备考之300个文言实词汇编(含课内句子).pdf VIP
- DB11∕T2293-2024住宅工程质量品质提升技术标准.pdf VIP
- Marantz马兰士家庭影院 AV 擴音機 SR8012 SR8012 Quick Start Guide English说明书用户手册.pdf
- 人教八上:专题六 无刻度直尺作图(含解析).docx VIP
- 2023年江西省中考语文试卷及答案解析.pdf VIP
- 2025年山东劳动职业技术学院高职单招笔试语文试题库含答案解析(5套共100道单选合辑).docx VIP
- 2025-2026学年七年级英语春季开学第一课 课件:马踏新春,趣学英语(全国通用版).pptx
原创力文档

文档评论(0)