- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
保和汤联合穴位贴敷促进胃癌术后肠蠕动恢复的临床研究.doc
保和汤联合穴位贴敷促进胃癌术后肠蠕动恢复的临床研究
[摘要] 目的 探讨保和汤联合穴位贴敷对胃癌术后肠蠕动恢复的作用。 方法 选择2014年8月~2015年2月在我院腹部外科行全胃切除术的62例胃癌患者,对照组31例采用常规护理方法;观察组31例则在常规护理方法的基础上,加用鼻饲保和汤、联合生大黄穴位贴敷的护理方法。观察两组患者术后胃管拔除的时间、首次肛门排气和排便时间以及腹痛腹胀发生率等。 结果 观察组胃管拔除时间明显早于对照组[(2.74±0.69)d vs(3.61±1.07)d,t=-2.131,P=0.037)];观察组肛门首次排气时间[(74.87±23.9)h vs (94.87±20.92)h,t=-3.502, P=0.001)]和首次排便时间[(5.68±1.48)d vs (6.45±1.22)d,t=-2.241,P=0.029)]明显早于对照组;观察组腹痛腹胀发生率明显低于对照组(16.12% vs 41.93%,χ2=5.010,P=0.025)。 结论 保和汤联合穴位贴敷可有效促进胃癌术后肠蠕动恢复。
[关键词] 胃癌;保和汤;穴位贴敷;肠蠕动功能
[中图分类号] R735.2 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2015)31-0107-04
Clinical study on the recovery of intestinal peristalsis treated with Baohe decoction and acupoint sticking in postoperative patient with gastric cancer
XU Yingping LIU Hongqin SHENG Huaying YANG Fang
Department of Abdominal Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China
[Abstract] Objective To investigate the efficacy of Baohe decoction combined with acupoint on the recovery of intestinal peristalsis in patient with postoperative gastric cancer. Methods A total of 62 cases with gastric cancer with total gastrectomy in the department of surgery in our hospital from August 2014 to February 2015 were enrolled in the study. The patient received routine nursing care in control group, and treated with Baohe decoction and Chinese medicine acupoint in the study group. Postoperative extubation time, anal exhaust time, defecation time were compared between in two groups. Results Extubation time in study group was significantly less than that in control group [(2.74±0.69) d vs (3.61±1.07) d, t=-2.131, P=0.037]. The anal exhaust time [(74.87±23.9) h vs (94.87±20.92) h, t=-3.502, P=0.001] and defecation time [(5.68±1.48) d vs (6.45±1.22) d, t=-2.241, P=0.029] in study group was significantly less than those in control group. The rate of abdominal pain in study group was lower than that in control group (16.12% vs 41.93%, χ2=5.010, P=0.025). Conclusion Baohe decoction combined with acupoint applicat
文档评论(0)