ph.d.generalexaminations.docVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
ph.d.generalexaminations

Ph.D. General Examinations Contextual Area Exam (Prof. Judith Donath, Examiner) Xinyu Hugo Liu Submitted August, 2004 Exam Questions 1) The language metaphor is often invoked in the sociological literature of identity; however, it may not be a particularly good metaphor for understanding many communicative systems. Address the ways that fashion, etc. are communicative systems that are different than language - and how and why they differ.?? Like language, they do enforce social boundaries, and talk about how they are similar in this goal. 2) In Metaphors We Live By, Lakoff and Johnson suggest that language and thoughts are grounded in metaphors, and that the way in which something is grounded shapes our understanding. In the identity literature, theories are grounded as well. Signalling, for example, is grounded in theories of evolution.?The question here is as we go on to look at the theories about objects, fashion, media, etc. is: Are they grounded? And if so, how.? Do the authors attempt to ground them? Some do, but end up with a circular definition. Others do not.? So for this essay, do start by defining what you mean by grounding; then discuss the clearer examples of “Metaphors We Live By” and Signalling; then discuss the more interpretive cases - the others do not explicitly say here is where we are grounded so you will have to interpret more. 3) Simmel states that we cannot know completely the individuality of another, nor can we comprehend our own individuality in its totality.? The only way to approximate an understanding of a persons identity is to use prototypes to conceptualize people.? Simmels prototypes happen to heavily relate to social roles -- bureaucrat, police officer, and businessman.? Looking at the gamut of treatises on identity in the literature, how does each fall within, augment, or contradict Simmels prototype theory of identity? Breakdown of the Language Metaphor Introduction Throughout much of the sociological litera

文档评论(0)

jvdodnnv002 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档