Pharmacist prescribing A scoping review about the views and experiences of patients and the public.pdfVIP

下载本文档

7
0
约6.16万字
约 16页
2017-03-16 发布于天津
举报
版权申诉

Pharmacist prescribing A scoping review about the views and experiences of patients and the public.pdf

1、本文档共16页，可阅读全部内容。
2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
5、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
6、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
7、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

Pharmacist prescribing A scoping review about the views and experiences of patients and the public.pdf

Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy 13 (2017) 1–16 Review Article Pharmacist prescribing: A scoping review about the views and experiences of patients and the public Ida-Maisie Famiyeh, B.Sc.Phm.a,b, Lisa McCarthy, Pharm.D., M.Sc.a,b,c,* aWomen’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada bLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada cDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Abstract Background: Policy-makers and health professionals’ views about pharmacist prescribing have been well studied, but less is known about the views of the public and patients. Objective: To describe from existing literature the views and experiences of patients as well as the views of the public about pharmacist prescribing. Methods: Sources: Medline, EMBASE, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts from inception to November 2015; reference lists of included studies. Inclusion criteria: English-language studies describing the views and experiences of patients and the views of the public about pharmacist prescribing. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts and one reviewer charted data. The University of British Columbia Patient Experience Framework was used to categorize and synthesize ?ndings about patients’ experience. Views were described using a descriptive thematic synthesis approach. Results: Out of 2377 unique records, 35 articles were reviewed in full for eligibility. Three studies were excluded because participants were not patients or the public, eight studies were not about prescribing, and four studies were abstracts. Two articles were identi?ed from the bibliographies of included studies. In total, twenty-two studies met inclusion criteria. Fourteen studies were quantitative (63.6%), six were qualitative (27.3%) and two were mixed design (9.1%) studies. Four studies (18.2%) were conducted in Canada (Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador,