主观社会地位评价标准的群体差异.pdfVIP

人口与发展 2014 年第 20卷第 6 期 POPULATION DEVELOPMENT Vol. 20 No.6 2014 |川-川..述 I 主观社会地位评价标准的群体差异 吴琼 (北京大学 中国社会科学调查中心，北京 1∞871 ) 摘要:不同群体对同一客观事实可能存在不同评价标准。锚定法通过采集对情景人物的评价来界定 评价标准。本研究旨在分析中国家庭追踪调查2012 年 15 岁以上或乡居民对情景人物主观社会地位 的评价，探索不同群体的评价标准差异。与参照群体理论一致，教育程度较高、家庭人均收入较高的群 体对主观社会地位的评价标准较高。除此之外，男性和城市居民的评价标准也较高。未考虑评价标准 差异前，男性与女性主观社会地位类似，城市居民主观社会地位低于农村居民;考虑评价标准差异后，男 性主观社会地位高于女性;城市居民主观社会地位与农村居民类似。主观社会地位的评价标准存在群 体差异性，忽视这种差异有可能造成分析结果偏误。 关键词:主观社会地位;评价标准;锚定法;群体差异 中图分类号 :C91 -03 文献标i只码 :A 文章编号 :1674 -1668(2014)06-∞63 -08 Response Heterogeneity in Ratings of Subjective Social Status WU Qiong ( lnstitωe 0.扎Social Science Suroey ,Peking Univers时 ， Beijing 1∞871 ， China) Abstract: Different groups may hold different standards when evaluating subjective social 酬us. Such response heterogeneity me蹦出at subjective ratings may be incomparable across groups. Anchoring vignettes address such heterogeneity by 描king responden恼 ωrate one or more hypo- thetical c甜s characterized by salient features ( i. e. ， vigne忧es). Based on the nationally repre- sentative China Family Panel Studies , the current study analyzed factors associated with 缸陀ial status ratings of two anchoring vi伊ettes ,and further explored the effects of al句usting for response heterogeneity in analyzing self rated social status. 咀le results showed that responden恼明白 higher education and higher income held higher standards when evaluating the social status of hypothet- ical cases. In addition , male and urban residents also held higher standards. The study further re- vealed that 由e effects of gender and urban status on 回lf rated social status changed after adjusting for response heterogeneity: males and females had similar ratings of s剧创ve social status before adjustment , and m由 showed higher social status ratings after adjustment: Urlan residents showed lower subjective social status than rural residents before adj山恤侃，and the groups were comparable I_after a句ustment.伽 findings s~皑白ted the presence of non - n唔ligible response