eralreasoningthanstandardlogics,whichdealwithuniversalstatements.Forexample,Nonmonotoniclog.pdf
- 1、本文档共6页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
eralreasoningthanstandardlogics,whichdealwithuniversalstatements.Forexample,Nonmonotoniclog
Nonmonotonic LogicsNonmonotonic logics are used to formalize plausible reasoning. They allow more gen-eral reasoning than standard logics, which deal with universal statements. For example,standard logics can easily represent the argument:All men are mortalSocrates is a man||||||Therefore, Socrates is mortal( (x)(Man(x) ) Mortal(x)); Man(Socrates) / Mortal(Socrates))but cannot represent reasoning such as:Birds typically
yTweety is a bird||||||Therefore, Tweety (presumably)
ies.Such arguments are characteristic of commonsense reasoning, where default rules andthe absence of complete information are prevalent.The most salient feature of nonmonotonic reasoning is that the conclusion of a nonmo-notonic argument may not be correct. For example, if Tweety is a penguin, it is incorrectto conclude that Tweety
ies. Nonmonotonic reasoning often requires jumping to a conclu-sion and subsequently retracting that conclusion as further information becomes available.Thus, as the set of assumptions grows, the set of conclusions (theorems) may shrink. Thisreasoning is called nonmonotonic in contrast to standard logic which is monotonic: as onesset of assumptions grows, ones set of theorems grows as well. (Formally, a system is mo-notonic if for any two theories A and B, whenever A is a subset of B, the theorems of A area subset of the theorems of B.)All systems of nonmonotonic reasoning are fundamentally concerned with the issue ofconsistency: ensuring that conclusions drawn are consistent with one another and with theassumptions.Default Logic (Reiter 1980) introduces a default rule, an inference rule consisting of anassumption, an appeal to the consistency of some formula, and a conclusion. For example,the rule Birds typically
y could be written as1
2Bird(x):Fly(x)|||||Fly(x)which reads: if x is a bird, and it is consistent that x
ies, then conclude that x
ies.Default rules must be applied with care, since con
icting default rules could cause in-consistency if used together.
您可能关注的文档
- C系列压缩机并联方案_双机 copy.pdf
- D-instanton sums for matter hypermultiplets.pdf
- D10 5517 for 气味试验.pdf
- D2MQ-4L-1;D2MQ-1;D2MQ-1L;D2MQ-1-TL;D2MQ-1L-TL;中文规格书,Datasheet资料.pdf
- D-Instanton effects in Type II and F-theory.pdf
- D4NS-SK01;中文规格书,Datasheet资料.pdf
- customuser.pdf
- dakl3amb8e0_KL3_CALPELLA_UMA_1223.pdf
- DARIEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.pdf
- Data Mining on Prices of Highway Project Main Material Based on WEB.pdf
文档评论(0)