承台桩基如图所示，桩基有4根钻孔桩组成，桩径d=1.docVIP

采用不同方法计算N根群桩沉降值的对比分析 马永宏 （浙江绿城东方建筑设计有限公司上海分公司 上海 200040） 【摘要】本文简单介绍了N根群桩柔度矩阵的概念和Mindlin应力公式，通过规范简化算法和分层综合法两种算法计算群桩的沉降值来验证程序采用Mindlin应力公式集成柔度矩阵算法的正确性。采用的工程实例为4m×4m的承台，承台下4根直径d=0.8m，桩长l=5m的端承桩，承台顶作用N=12000kN的集中力。其中规范简化算法算得的沉降值26.2mm，分层总和法算得的沉降值41.8mm均小于程序采用Mindlin应力公式集成柔度矩阵算法得出的沉降值73mm，分析其原因在于规范算法和分层总和法均没有考虑桩与桩之间的相互影响，而是把群桩与桩间土当成一个整体，这两种算法采用的简化更多，与群桩真实的应力状态相差甚远，因而程序采用Mindlin应力公式集成柔度矩阵算法的基本思路是将明氏对于集中荷载的解直接应用到每根单桩上，然后将所有的桩在地基中引起的应力进行叠加，再将结果用于沉降计算。这种方法较传统的方法有所突破，比规范简化算法和分层总和法优越。 【关键词】群桩 柔度矩阵 Mindlin应力公式 分层总和法 The Verification of Settlement value for N Pile group Calculated by Computer procedures Ma Yonghong (Zhejiang Greentown Oriental Architects Limited Company, Shanghai, 200040) 【Abstract】This article briefly introduces the concept of N Pile group flexibility matrix and Mindlin stress formula. The settlement value calculated using Mindlin stress formula for integration flexibility matrix algorithm is correct which authenticated by simply Code method and Layer wise summation method. It is proved by a Project example. The settlement value calculated though simply Code method is 26.2mm and 41.8mm is calculated by Layer wise summation method. The two value were all less then the value 113mm which calculated using Mindlin stress formula for integration flexibility matrix algorithm. The reason for this phenomenon is the first two method simplified more which is far away from the real stress state. The basic idea of Mindlin stress formula for integration flexibility matrix algorithm is directly applied the result by concentrated load on each pile, then added stress caused by all the piles in the foundation, last use the result for settlement calculation. This method is a breakthrough for traditional approach, is super than the first two method. 【Key words】Pile group；Flexibility matrix；Mindlin stress formula；Layer wise summation method 1.问题的提出 目前我国各类技术规范中，对沉降计算方法的规定，除了某些行业采用叶果洛夫法之外，绝大多数是用分层总和法。前者是直接分析半无限空间体中不同部位的应变关系，计算出压缩量；后者则首先分析土体中的应力分布，再依据压缩模量的大小计算沉降量。 在分层总和法中，对于土体中的附加应