网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

Columbia University in the Novelty Track at TREC.pdf

Columbia University in the Novelty Track at TREC.pdf

  1. 1、本文档共8页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Columbia University in the Novelty Track at TREC

Columbia University in the Novelty Track at TREC 2004 Barry Schiffman Columbia University New York, N.Y. 10027 bschiff@ Kathleen R. McKeown Columbia University New York, N.Y. 10027 kathy@ ABSTRACT Our system for the Novelty Track at TREC 2004 looks be- yond sentence boundaries as well as within sentences to identify novel, nonduplicative passages. It tries to iden- tify text spans of two or more sentences that encompass mini-segments of new information. At the same time, we avoid any pairwise comparison of sentences, but rely on the presence of previously unseen terms to provide evidence of novelty. The system is guided by a number of parameters, both weights and thresholds, that are learned automatically with a randomized hill-climbing algorithm. During learning, we varied the target function to produce configurations that emphasize either precision or recall. We also implemented a straightforward vector-space model as a comparison and to test a combined approach. 1. INTRODUCTION The novelty detection problem seeks an automatic way of identifying any new information in a document, or docu- ments, on a given topic. It is a recent area of inquiry in the Natural Language Processing and Information Retrieval communities and has been explored at the last three meet- ings of the Text Retrieval Conference (TREC), in the Nov- elty Track. After the first Novelty Track in 2002, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) separated the track into four tasks, two of which combined passage retrieval and novelty filtering and two of which concentrated on novelty filtering, giving participants the choice of whether to do the combined tasks (Tasks 1 and/or 3) or whether to focus on the novelty detection alone (Tasks 2 and/or 4). In the com- bined tasks, participants have to first choose the sentences that are “relevant” to a given topic from a set of documents, and then make a second pass to remove duplicates. In the pure novelty task, participants are given an order

文档评论(0)

l215322 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档