FEDERALTRADECOMMISSIONONADVERTISING.docVIP

  1. 1、本文档共3页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
FEDERALTRADECOMMISSIONONADVERTISING

“GROUND ZERO” FOR INSURANCE ADVERTISING LAW Although many insurance advertising regulations exist on the state level, most of these rules apply to life, annuity and health insurance products. Property/casualty insurers have very little to be concerned with in this area. Conversations with advertising reviewers for P/C advertising indicate they mostly rely on “not misleading” guidelines of the states’ Unfair Trade Practices acts. Some additional discussion of the basis for advertising law may be helpful. Although other insurers have numerous laws to follow for general advertising, all insurers might want to review the notes on internet advertising at the end of this article. DIRECTIONS FROM THE FTC One of the main regulators of all types of business advertising is the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Under the primary Act, the FTC indicates that advertising in general must Be truthful (not deceptive) Be provable Be fair Truthful and Not Deceptive The FTC has a Deception Policy Statement to explain this concept. An ad is deceptive if it contains or omits information that is material, or important to the consumer’s ability to make a good decision, and is misleading, or would cause a “reasonable consumer” to make their decision based on false conclusions. Materiality has to do with the product’s benefits or cost, for instance. In general, when the FTC is reviewing advertising to determine whether or not it is deceptive, the reviewers take the viewpoint of a “reasonable consumer” (not unlike the “reasonable person” standard used in legal cases). Looking at the entire ad in context, rather than a word-by-word analysis, the FTC looks at both “express” (literal) and “implied” (inferred) claims. For instance, these two could be demonstrated such: “This policy will save you money.” Or “This policy has saved Americans like you thousands of dollars each year.” If an advertisement leaves out language that is material for the consumer to make a valid decision, it is also

文档评论(0)

***** + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档